Welcome to DirtRider.Net
FREE FORUM MEMBERSHIP and NO ADVERTISEMENTS.
TURN-OFF THE ADS!

Which of these two

Hey guys I'm about to get my first bike, I live in nh so will be doing a lot of trail riding. I was

  • 1991 Kx 125

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1995 rm 125

    Votes: 2 100.0%

  • Total voters
    2
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
2
Likes
0
Points
1
#1
Hey guys I'm about to get my first bike, I live in nh so will be doing a lot of trail riding. I was wondering if anyone could offer any insite on which of these two I should get. 91 kx125 or a 95 rm125.
 

Find PARTS, TOOLS & GEAR Close-outs and Deals from multiple dealer inventories.
Try It!

truespode

Wheelie King
Joined
Jun 30, 1999
Messages
7,568
Likes
94
Points
48
Website
truespode.net
#2
If all things are equal go with the newer one.

However, no matter what the age the biggest issue is condition and wear & tear. The 95 will have better suspension just due to being a bit newer and the advances made but if it is all beat to death and needs money then it won't be worth it.

I had a 2000 Gas Gas and it was great. I didn't feel at a disadvantage and was able to keep up with the same guys riding my 2000 GG as I did on my 2006 YZ450F, even on a very hilly area.

Ivan
 
- a d v e r t i s e m e n t -

Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
2
Likes
0
Points
1
#3
Hey guys I'm about to get my first bike, I live in nh so will be doing a lot of trail riding. I was wondering if anyone could offer any insite on which of these two I should get. 91 kx125 or a 95 rm125.

Thanks for your response. I actually talked to both guys with the bikes and the kx is fully rebuilt and has fmf exhaust already and factory connection suspension while the rm is stock so I think I'm going to go with the kx.