P polle Member Aug 4, 2005 3 0 Aug 7, 2005 #1 this is good setup mx crf250r 2005.Spring 0.42 and 2.2 ICS comp. 30.1 x 14 27.1 30.1 x 2 29.1 28.1 x 2 26.1 24.1 23.1 22.1 21.1 20.1 18.1 30.5 x 2mm Active: 08x 20.1x4 stock +2x20.1 17.1 x 4 9.5 x .2 x 1 10.2 x 2 2mm Post Float .2mm rebound 20.1 19.1 18.1 12.1 16.1 14.1 13.1 12.1 11.2 16.3 x 3 Last edited: Aug 8, 2005
this is good setup mx crf250r 2005.Spring 0.42 and 2.2 ICS comp. 30.1 x 14 27.1 30.1 x 2 29.1 28.1 x 2 26.1 24.1 23.1 22.1 21.1 20.1 18.1 30.5 x 2mm Active: 08x 20.1x4 stock +2x20.1 17.1 x 4 9.5 x .2 x 1 10.2 x 2 2mm Post Float .2mm rebound 20.1 19.1 18.1 12.1 16.1 14.1 13.1 12.1 11.2 16.3 x 3
marcusgunby LIFETIME SPONSOR Jan 9, 2000 6,450 2 Aug 7, 2005 #2 Thanks for sharing your stack, What weight of rider is this aimed at, and what did you feel was the main problems with the std fork?
Thanks for sharing your stack, What weight of rider is this aimed at, and what did you feel was the main problems with the std fork?
steve125 LIFETIME SPONSOR Oct 19, 2000 1,252 0 Aug 7, 2005 #3 How does it compare to the std valving?? On the track and on paper??
P polle Member Aug 4, 2005 3 0 Aug 8, 2005 Thread starter #4 I weight is 67kg=147lbs (with out gear).Stock fork feel harsh over braking bumps/ small chop and bike understeers.Clicker setting comp.4-8 and reb.12-18.stock valving. Last edited: Aug 8, 2005
I weight is 67kg=147lbs (with out gear).Stock fork feel harsh over braking bumps/ small chop and bike understeers.Clicker setting comp.4-8 and reb.12-18.stock valving.