Nope, not a drop of pissment in the vicinity. Just trying to clear up stuff.
I don't understand.
re: '..if you decide to go the way of the Eric Gorr 225..'
That indicates the basic subject is a 200, cuz the overbored 220 is a 240.
re: 'you will have more low end than the 220 with all the top end rev of the 200. '
That indicates the basic subject is a 200.
re: 'Eric states that he preffers to go this way..'
....still talking about the 200.......right?
re: 'you will not get the top end out of the 200...'
If that was '220' it would make sense. You're saying you will not get the top end out of a 200 that you will out of a 220?
In which case, why the prior comments concerning the 200 being the 'way to go.'
I didn't talk to EG, but I read of a comment relayed by a reliable source that said EG preferred the 200 for successful portwork because the port angles of the 220 made it a less likely (without a whole lotta trouble) hop-up candidate.
I may well have misunderstood that, too.
OK...so I'm slow sometimes. I'd appreciate enlightenment, though.
Thanks.