KDX 200 Stock Pipe Modification VS FMF Fatty/Rev Pipe

M

mlhend1

Member

Apr 17, 2002

186

0

• Jun 11, 2002

• #1

I made Canadian Dave's Pipe Modification (removing the silencing material and screen) and saw a GREAT Improvement in torque and overall horse power with little difference in noise. I have heard with this modification the stock pipe performs like a FMF Pipe. Has anyone tried the pipe modification mentioned and also tried a FMF Pipe. I would like to see a graph of torque/horsepower comparing the two types.

 

Brian

Stanbagger

N. Texas SP

LIFETIME SPONSOR

May 1, 2001

1,452

0

• Jun 11, 2002

• #2

I have an extra pipe to play with, but have never heard of modifying the stock pipe? Do you mean silencer?

 

Canadian Dave

Super Power AssClown

Apr 28, 1999

1,202

0

• Jun 11, 2002

• #3

Stan_Flemmings the mod only works on 89 to 94 pipes.

mlhend1 I’ve used a modified pipe and used a bike with an FMF pipe. The two are very comparable with the modified pipe having a little more bottom to mid grunt imo. The 89 to 94 FMF pipe is a moto pipe intended to improve power everywhere rather than focus an improvement on the bottom-mid like a torque pipe or mid-upper like a rev pipe.

David

 

M

MassKDX

Member

Dec 11, 2001

128

0

• Jun 11, 2002

• #4

Stan,

He is refering to the older model KDX's. The older KDX's have a packing similar to the silencer in the pipe. The newer ones do not have this packing.

 

Brian

Stanbagger

N. Texas SP

LIFETIME SPONSOR

May 1, 2001

1,452

0

• Jun 11, 2002

• #5

Oh... DO I feel stupid now, or what :confused: