The CR is NOT low on power......2002, 2003, and 2004 CR's make great power if not more than every other two stroke with the exception of the KTM...
The confusion sets in with the idiotic magazine editors...The CR makes it's hard pulling power in the mid to top end...The mag editors usually are usually novice level motocrossers...Old novice level motocrossers with a weight problem...They prefer bikes that come on the pipe easy that have good low end and can be more forgiving of mistakes..Like if you enter a corner in the wrong gear or you're going too slow, a bike with lots of low end is easy to get on the pipe and can have you charging out with the engine singing.
The CR doesn't forgive mistakes or slowness unless you're very aggressive...It's a very fast bike but makes its hard pulling power higher in the rpm range than some of the other bikes...
It's advantages are just the opposite of the other bikes...Where the other bikes tend to go flat and drop power at high revs, the CR is still pulling...HARD...A stock CR is at an advantage on long tracks verses a YZ is more potent on tighter tracks and is more user friendly.
I've ridden Eric Gorrs modified CR's and they are potent...Very potent...A stock CR 250 is fast...After Eric Gorr modifications you just have more of everything.