Roadless Rule HR4865

Ol'89r

LIFETIME SPONSOR
Jan 27, 2000
6,961
45
See, we really can make a difference. :yeehaw: :yeehaw:

A big thumbs up for everyone that helped. :thumb:

Ol'89r
 

OnAnySunday

Big Pig
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Nov 20, 2000
998
3
lost in the deserts of NM
 

Tod

~SPONSOR~
Jul 3, 2002
368
0
Actually, i dont think it COULD be done. Maybey after a century or 2 if we tried really, REALLY hard. (cutting down trees as fast as we possibly could.)

I too, do believe we COULD clearcut the place clean, but unfortunately alot quicker than that. I've seen poorly practiced forestry ruin more than one riding area.
:|

Logging is not the real issue anyway, merely a red hearing to keep the warm and fuzzy feel-good people in a tizzle. The real issue at hand is public access to public lands. Every forest related piece of legislation put forth by the GAGs involves reduced public access, reducing the dispersability of population. Any well informed communist or tyrant wannabe will tell you dispersed populations are hard to control. They need centralized population centers for human management purposes. Ref: Al Gore- Earth in the Balance, Dave Foreman -Wildlands Project.

Off the soapbox and out to the garage
(oh wait, I could stand on a bike stand and hollar too) ;)
Tod
 
Last edited:

ktmboy

~SPONSOR~
Apr 1, 2001
2,474
0
I agree that clearcutting is a bad thing, but I think selective thinning is good for the forest and good for our pocket-books! :thumb:
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…