Home
Basic Dirt Bike How-To's - Video
Dirt Bike How-To's - Video
Living The Moto Life - Video
Bike Tests | Shoot-Outs - Video
Forums
What's new
Latest activity
Log-In
Join
What's new
Menu
Log-In
Join
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Close Menu
Forums
Dirt Bike Discussions By Brand
Dirt Bike Brands - Other
sst vs fatty
Reply to thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
[QUOTE="snb73, post: 1216616, member: 49046"] I have a 2003 RM 265 with an SST Pipe and run CAM2 110. I used to run a Fatty with this set-up. I installed the SST pipe after riding half a day at Budds Creek. (To get a realistic side by side comparison) I immediately noticed more pull/torque in the low to mid range. To be honest both pipes seemed very simular. But the SST's torque seemed to come on sooner and last longer into the top end. The SST has a bit more over-rev. I am pleased with the selection. Sometimes, I lug my bike a bit like a four-stroke. While other times I rev it very high. The pipe works well with both riding styles. As a side note, I had a cracked lower mount at the 6 months and FMF fixed it free of charge. (I had to ship it to them of course) FMF warrantees their pipes for 12 months. If your riding woods mostly look into the FMF Gnarly. Usable power is better than having power you can't use. Good luck, Steve. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which ocean is California closest to?
Post reply
Forums
Dirt Bike Discussions By Brand
Dirt Bike Brands - Other
sst vs fatty
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom