I am interested in buying a steering stabilizer and was wondering, which is better, Scotts or GPR. I see in most pictures of the top off road riders run GPR's.
I've used both, they both do basically the same thing. The Scotts is a hard anodized unit, I can't say for sure w/ this GPR setup I've got. I DO know GPR has excellent customer service...at most big events they will rebuild at the track for free.
Performance wise...I can't tell a difference, although the GPR seems to reduce arm pump even more than the Scotts-not sure why. They both are a must have in terms of damper vs. no damper. I do like the larger knob on the GPR...pretty nit-picky. Both good units. If the GPR lasts as long as my Scotts, I'll give the nod to GPR.
I have a Scotts on the KX 500 that I use for long desert races & a GPR on the CR 250 that I use for play riding & enduros. Can't tell them apart, but I do like the GPR's larger knob.
On some sites I have read that the Scotts does not have return damping but the GPR doe. Is this good or bad. Also, I was looking at damper combos and the scotts one is $80 more then the GPR. Is it worth the extra money to get the scotts with the high speed damping to. I race hare scrambles and was wondering which one would be better for it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.