inverted forks don't really have any advantage besides eliminating the hang down on the stock conventional forks.
The underhang, is the 4 inchs that hangs below the wheel. You can lower the forks in the triple clamps up to 10mm. That will allow the bike to turn much better. Lowering is not for you if high speed riding is your thingJeff Sexton said:Somewhere else in this forum I heard someone refer to the KDX forks as "underhung." This is interesting to me. Would triple clamps with a different offset solve this problem? I'm thinking if you stretched the front end just a tad (increase trail?) it would make the bike more stable. I realize I'd be sacrificing a bit of handling but the increased stabililty seems like it would be worth the trade.
ckf said:hi, sold my 200exc(too powerful for me) to purchase a '97 220. this 220 is a japanese domestic model, not sure if the shock is the same as the off-road model as from the States, but the front end has a '91 KDX 200 inverted fork. suspension is a disappointment, exc is way better. is revalving a worthy job for both front and back end or KX suspension is the way to go? also, can a KX shock fit in KDX?
lepper said:91's were inverted and non-cartridge.
I believe your right Gear-Got your Mountain Dew Yet??? ;)G. Gearloose said:Uhm, no. 93/94 were USD, not 91.
perhaps the 250 was in 91
yikes, guess I left an impression? Actually, been crisp and clean with no caffine for 2-3 years.Green Hornet said:Got your Mountain Dew Yet??? ;)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?