Home
Basic Dirt Bike How-To's - Video
Dirt Bike How-To's - Video
Living The Moto Life - Video
Bike Tests | Shoot-Outs - Video
Forums
What's new
Latest activity
Log-In
Join
What's new
Menu
Log-In
Join
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Close Menu
Forums
MX, SX & Off-Road Discussions
General Moto | Off-Topic Posts
Toyota Tundra?
Reply to thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
[QUOTE="yarbonwick, post: 104413, member: 17583"] I see what you are saying Bwalker. By pure virtue of ramming into another vehicle and both doing the crunching, there would be more forces released and not distributed to the drivers. I don't have to go to AI school to figure that one. However, I believe in surpassing the standards. And being able to handle a concrete bearer and still not having the forces exerted to the driver, by electronic measurement of the crash dummies, just think about how well you would fair by the result of a onset crash. Which BTW happens a hell of lot more times than the other manufactures would lead you to believe- 8,465 times angled and 6,653 head-on in 1999. Mind you I don't have a Tundra. I am gambling with the Dodge Dakota I have. T-bone crashes, though considerably lower, are what concern me the most though. None of the modern technology to have a higher survivable rate help though when 2/3's of all fatalities in motor vehicles in 1999 were unrestrained. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which ocean is California closest to?
Post reply
Forums
MX, SX & Off-Road Discussions
General Moto | Off-Topic Posts
Toyota Tundra?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom