Smit-Dog said:Mike - Sorry if you were offended, that was not my intent.
2TrakR said:Tom,
Your recent read was right on the $. There is supposed to be another area, not just the Mounds. I think that place was the "close enough" for the Program to not complete it's job.
A private facility could make a killing on entry fees alone down that way, that's fur sure.
Thanks for your input!
woodsy said:"...As long as you are in our midst you may as well hear what we are all about.. For us, there is nothing more thrilling then developing the skills necessary to weave a 2 wheeler thru the woodsyest, tightest, narliest, hilliest, muddiest terrain possible. The challenge of learning to ride on one wheel while manuvering over logs/rocks/stumps while at the same time maintaining forward motion thru a 32 inch wide trail is BREATHTAKINGLY a riot!! The FUN in woods riding for a great number of us is found in the slower pace (usually under 40 mph) of "technical single tracking". For most of us, the more technical it gets - the slower it gets, the more concentration it takes and the bigger the thrill gets!! :aj:
I tell you this because it seems like there are some people who may not totally understand the differences between this sport and quading....".
Woodsy
fatherandson said:"..I am pretty sure that I sat behind TBL at the meeting in Lansing. Most of the comments after his speech included...All ORV (2 wheel, 4 wheel and full size) need to work together. I am just glad he was limited to 5 minutes...."
2TrakR said:fatherandson - what area are you working on trail props for? Anything I (we) can do to assist with the process?
2TrakR said:Kind of sounds like a soured individual whose chosen mount is not legal for use on public lands in the lower peninsula except on the few ORV Routes that exist nowhere near his place of residence. Too bad they are not eligible for being made street legal either.
Nestrick said:"....Therefore, I strongly agree with Woodsy, I hope this debate is closed until all of the data promised is available and has been assessed by folks "of the stature" of 2TrakR … only then, will we be in a defensible position to decide what said data actually means relative to the riding public, and that includes everyone!
terry nestrick :bang:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?