Phil said:Sigurd, I guess you really must be old! You can't even remember what year you were born!;) So far I've seen 1941, 1965, and 1920.
sigurd said:But, yes, I've been around many decades longer than you my dear.
XRpredator said:I wanna see squeak's tattoo.
XRpredator said:I wanna see squeak's tattoo.
squeaky said:For the record - I have no issue with the fact that this gear is made all pretty pretty. I just wish those of us that don't care for it had more options...
CR Swade said:did this guy really spend 3 pages arguing about women's fashion? Dude just broke at least 30 really strict guy rules. Did you notice he was strangely absent during the running of Dr.Phil and Oprah?
squeaky said:LMAO I think "this guy" is actually a chick...
Treejumper said:I have pictures! ;)
sigurd said:But, yes, I've been around many decades longer than you my dear.............................I had to keep grabbing smaller and smaller sizes...
BadgerMan said:OK....I am really confused. Someone is upset because folks think they are younger than they actually are and because they have to buy smaller sized clothing than they used to buy
BadgerMan said:So basically, the desire is to be old and large?
BadgerMan said:Personally, I think women should have the options so they can wear whatever makes them happy. A happy woman looks good regardless what she is wearing.
BadgerMan said:BTW, if the size reference tag bothers you, rip it off and throw it away. It does not serve much of a purpose after you get the item home.
CR Swade said:is it too late to ask to see the tatoo pics?? I'm just sayin'...
squeaky said:This is true...and if in 1982 you were a size 8 and in 2007 you're a size 4- is that a bad thing? I think not...
Rooster said:That's my wife you are talking about mister! :p
XRpredator said:good think weren't talking about men's fashion.
CR Swade said:Oh I see how it is...treejumper just throws the pics out there to tease us and whatnot. I would have been none the wiser and now not so blatantly curious/frustrated had he not announced to the whole World Wide WWW that he did indeed have pics of said tattoo. I think you should be getting after Tree J and his over friendly camera...not me, I'm just a victim in this sick little mess.
See what happens when women start talking fashion? Somebody's orientation got called into question, a spouse got mad and body art pics get lost in the shuffle...it just wasn't worth it IMO :whoa: