yz250flash
~SPONSOR~
- Aug 8, 2003
- 150
- 0
It has been a long time since I have done a top end on a two stroke. I know that they require an extra rich ratio (15 to 1 or so) when breaking in new, do I need that for a top end rebuild break-in also?
NOyz250flash said:It has been a long time since I have done a top end on a two stroke. I know that they require an extra rich ratio (15 to 1 or so) when breaking in new, do I need that for a top end rebuild break-in also?
You can tell the Australian School System teaches better math. Us YANKS have spinning heads after reading that ;)ellandoh said::yikes: this guy is busting out the chinese arithmetic..sheesh :rotfl: my head hurts
lol j/k
19Brendan81 said:I always run a rebuilt two stroke with more oil than I normally use, I do this on chainsaws, mowers and dirtbikes. It is important to do this to allow the rings to wear in properly with the cylinder wall, and when done properly will give you longer service life between top end service jobs. This is why the manufacturers recommend doing it. Obviously more oil in the premix means less fuel hence the engine running leaner, but even going from 40:1 to 15:1 doesn’t have as dramatic effect as it would seem.
Ideally two strokes are tuned to run 12.5 parts air to each part of premix this is known as the “Stoichiometric ratio”. Straight gasolines stoichiometric ratio is 14.7:1, increasing past this causes lean out. Two strokes run a richer stoichiometric ratio because scavenging losses lean it out a bit, Canadian daves site says ideal is 12.5:1. SO a two stroke running 40:1 premix contains 97.5% fuel and 2.5% oil, or .975 parts fuel to each 12.5 parts air OR its Stoichiometric ratio is 1 part fuel per 12.82 parts air. Chang the fuel:oil ratio to 15:1 and the figures change to 93.4% fuel and 6.6% oil, or .934 parts fuel to each 12.5 parts air OR 1 part fuel to 13.38 parts air. So, 15:1 is half a part leaner in stoichiometric ratio than 40:1…and that’s not enough to cause lean out in your engine.