Home
Basic Dirt Bike How-To's - Video
Dirt Bike How-To's - Video
Living The Moto Life - Video
Bike Tests | Shoot-Outs - Video
Forums
What's new
Latest activity
Log-In
Join
What's new
Menu
Log-In
Join
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Close Menu
Forums
Other Dirt Bike Discussions
Who to Ride With, Where to Ride
By Region
Western USA
Walker Valley Closure
Reply to thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
[QUOTE="Tod, post: 450148, member: 32697"] Here's the article that will start appearing soon. You can contact Doug Sutherland, Washington State Commissioner of Public Lands at: [email]doug.sutherland@wadnr.gov[/email] 360.902.1004 (they will try to divert your call to someone else, but you can insist on talking to Sutherland) Doug Sutherland Dept of Natural Resources PO Box 47001 Olympia, WA 98504-7001 PS - be forthright, but polite *********************** OUTRAGE OVER THE WALKER VALLEY ORV AREA CLOSURE! Aaarrgghhh! Motorized ORV enthusiasts have been set up, misled, and stonewalled, all so as to be easily knocked down and robbed of a precious recreation resource. We have officially lost Walker Valley, in a seasonal closure, from November 1 to April 1 (five months). And the conclusion that our Department of Natural Resources (DNR) land and recreation managers intentionally drove this closure, indeed, intentionally thwarted all attempts by users to deal with the problems supposedly driving this action, appears unavoidable and unassailable. And when you read the story behind this closure that follows the description of Walker Valley in italics below, you will be mad as hell. At this point, I am going to leave the names of the DNR staff who did this to us out of the picture. After you read this, consider that besides the lost opportunity for your family, that approximately 7000 user visits will not happen during this closure. Think what that means for regional associated businesses. Where will the displaced riders go? Have they not just been forced towards unmanaged, unsanctioned riding areas? Is that what DNR land management wants? It certainly is not what the Northwest Motorcycle Association (NMA) and responsible motorized recreation enthusiasts desire! {Walker Valley is an off road vehicle trail system located east of Mount Vernon/Big Lake/Highway 9, accessed via Peter Burns road, on state land managed by the DNR. There are approximately twenty-eight miles of sanctioned off-road vehicle/multiple use trails on the 6500 acres designated for ORV use at this site. The trail system is located in an area which has upland streams classified as level 4 and 5. That means, by official definition, that runoff typically does not threaten fish life. The trail system provides opportunities for various enthusiasts of off road vehicles including motorcycles, quads, and jeeps, along with mountain bicycles. It is currently the ONLY SANCTIONED ORV opportunity in the DNR Northwest Region in Puget Sound (Reiter Trails is not an official ORV area, the usage is "tolerated" by the DNR, and they have consistently refused to consider designating and managing it as such themselves, insisting that Snohomish County must take over and operate it similar to Thurston County ORV).} So, to the best of our understanding, here is how this stunning, unfair, Walker Valley winter closure went down. THE DNR WORKS ON A TRAIL ASSESSMENT PROJECT . The DNR invited the Dept. of Ecology (DOE) to visit and inspect the Walker Valley ORV system in March 2001, as part of an ongoing trail assessment effort. . The DOE submitted its findings in a report to the DNR August 2001. . At some later point in 2001, this DOE report was mentioned at one of the monthly DNR-User Group meetings, and its results were communicated as insignificant in terms of issues. THE DNR APPEARS TO HAVE DECIDED TO A SEASONAL CLOSURE, AND TO USE THE "SECRETS" OF THE DOE REPORT AS JUSTIFICATION . At the May 2002 meeting, the notion of a seasonal closure was brought up by the DNR, the DOE report was communicated to be the basis for this, because the Walker Valley ORV area was out of compliance. This was completely the opposite of what had been communicated previously. . In spite of repeated requests, the DNR refused to provide a copy of the report or disclose the details. Per the DNR, the DOE had both tested and observed various streams and determined that there were impacts to water quality from the ORV use. Per the DNR, this meant that the DOE report had concluded that these impacts comprised a non-compliance conclusion (which, under DOE powers, means rectify or suffer closure). . In June, after many attempts to get DNR to tell the motorized users exactly what the problem areas were, to no avail, the DNR essentially told the user groups that they (the users) knew what the problems were, and that they would have to fix them. Further, they now told us that failure to do so would result in a seasonal closure, running from Nov. 1 through March or April 1, clearly implying that the DOE would be the legal force behind this. SKAGIT M/C CONTINUES TO ATTEMPT TO WORK TO RECTIFY ANY AND ALL DOE ISSUES AND AVOID THE CLOSURE . Later in June, given a now apparently intentional lack of guidance or leadership from DNR, Skagit M/C presented a detailed written proposal to DNR, outlining specific plans, trail by trail, to address possible issues they supposed were behind the DOE report. That proposal was not forwarded to any other management within the local DNR staff for five weeks, and has to date not been responded to. . User groups, led by Skagit M/C, organized the needed work parties, by the DNR. A written report on this task list has also been given to the DNR by Skagit M/C. . Then, as Skagit and volunteers prepared to continue their series of very well advertised and attended work weekends in September, all focused on suspected DOE issues, DNR informed Skagit that their first weekend was cancelled, removed Skagit's lock from the gate chain, and told them that they could perform no more work without direct DNR supervision (after decades of effective, cooperative trail work by the club!). The stated problem behind this was that 100 feet of repaired trail obliterated by a logging sale had not been created exactly where agreed to. (Note that local DNR staff claims, contrary to ongoing experience in other DNR lands, that they cannot contracturally require the logging company to repair such trails, even when they were built by significant expenditure of public money in the first place). Skagit stated that they would obliterate the misplaced 100 feet and redo it, but this was not accepted by the DNR including massive area communication, and received strong volunteer support from within and without the club. DNR APPEARS TO ACTIVELY THWART SKAGIT M/C'S EFFORTS . Also note that,the DNR did walk trails with Skagit earlier in the summer, and provided a list of minor repairs deemed necessary. These alternative tasks were not DOE report issues. Over three weekends in June, July and August, Skagit volunteers completed most of these tasks, in priority order, but were growing concerned and frustrated knowing that their work was addressing none of the suspected DOE issues. At the same time, the material for three bridges promised by the DNR, work that did seem like it might be part of the big picture, were delayed/not provided, who personally obliterated it and placed a Trail Closed sign up. . The DNR's pulling of Skagit's approval and ability to open the gate to perform trail work is nothing short of astounding given their decades of competent output, involving thousands of man hours. IT SEEMS CLEAR THAT DNR DECIDED ON THE CLOSURE LONG AGO, AND WILL LET NOTHING GET IN THE WAY . Around this point in time, the club was also told that they should get used to the idea of a winter closure, and that the hundreds of weekly users should consider taking up basketball in the winter! WE FIND OUT THE TRUTH ABOUT THE DOE REPORT! . Rider, trail work volunteer, and attorney Ben Wells obtained the DOE report via a Freedom Of Information request to Olympia, just after those DNR actions. Although there were some trail issues mentioned in the report, the major issues appear to be with the bridge on Peter Burns Road just as it enters the trailhead parking lot. . The DOE report recommended against closing Walker Valley. . Ben Wells then submitted a detailed written report on this chain of events to the DNR staff. THE CLOSURE BECOMES OFFICIAL . At the 9/24/02 monthly DNR-User Group meeting, the closure was officially announced. It was framed as a good thing by the DNR, allowing a full trail assessment and rework. An IAC grant to pursue a three man trail maintenance team was to be applied for (working about 9 months per year, for two years, with truck and tools). Be happy, we want to turn Walker into a state-of-the art ORV area! Although requested to by the DNR, Skagit M/C chose not to officially support the closure. So, the trails in the Walker Valley ORV area are closed to their intended users for five months, starting November 1! It sure seems that the DNR at some point decided to use the DOE report to drive this seasonal closure, and then ensured that nothing, not a willing volunteer crew, or open communications, or their own trail maintenance (essentially none), would get in the way! Oddly, given the DOE report's apparent focus on the bridge on Peter Burns Rd by the lot, only the ORV trails are closed, and only to motorized vehicles. Hikers, equestrians and mountain bikes can still use them. Peter Burns Rd remains open. Our IAC funds intended to pay for motorized recreation at Walker Valley will now be used, for almost half of the year, to pay for non-motorized recreation, as well as pay to enforce the closure, to keep out motorized users. That adds insult to injury! But where will the region's riders go all winter? Will this closure be once only, or every year? How will the regional businesses cope with the lost income? What will Walker be turned into, really? Will this notion of closing ORV areas to motorized users on a seasonal basis spread to other DNR ORV areas? Imagine Tahuya being close for the winter! The NMA will not let this poor management decision go unchallenged! With your support, the NMA will review the history of events and the decision process and take further actions as warranted. While further communications to higher DNR officials may resolve this problem, the recent history of decisions by the NW Region and its seemingly adversarial, uncooperative and often unresponsive communications with the motorized users indicates that resolving this will require more different actions by NMA. Our motorized users have done everything possible to try and work the DNR to resolve real and alleged trail problems. It seems that the DNR is not interested in maintaining good relations with the Walker Valley motorized users. Nor does the DNR seem to intend to build upon the sincere volunteer efforts to date by our users. Instead, DNR seems to be taking unilateral and biased actions that will serve only to further antagonize relations with the motorized community and will further decimate off-road motorized trail riding opportunities. If a decision is reached by NMA to take more serious steps to challenge this action by DNR, we know that the you and the other individuals, clubs and businesses that love and support motorized riding will be ready to support our efforts. Please stay tuned! In the meantime, after the last day in October, you must respect the closure while we work to correct this injustice. Failure to do so will harm our efforts! Thank you, Tory Briggs NMA President [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which ocean is California closest to?
Post reply
Forums
Other Dirt Bike Discussions
Who to Ride With, Where to Ride
By Region
Western USA
Walker Valley Closure
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom