mtk said:A caliper isn't a sensitive enough measuring instrument to show the differences in size between an "A" and a "B" piston.
Ok, this is what I don't get - sorry for using metrics by the way,
Huh???? What does the unit of measure have to do with accuracy? Accuracy is determined principally by the measuring instrument and the skill of the user. It makes absolutely no difference if you're using imperial or metric units. Neither system is inhearently any more accurate than the other. It's certainly easier to measure something in whatever system was used in it's manufacture to eliminate having to convert back and forth, but unless you're splitting tenths, it's just not an issue.steve.emma said:....dont be sorry, metric is the most accurate way to make measurements....
steve.emma said:so the tiny amount in size difference between an A or B piston will not make the slightest bit of difference anyway. QUOTE]
If you have a cylinder that is slightly worn, lets say .002 oversized or .002 out of spec. The difference between the A and B piston will put you back in spec. In a race engine, 1/10's are important.
Bunya.
Thanks for asking that. I was wondering the same thing. :coocoo:
No, you can't! Sorry Dirt but there's no way a caliper is accurate enough for these measurements. In the hands of a skilled machinist, they're good for maybe .001". In the hands of a novice, you can't expect any better than .005". A machinst NEVER uses calipers for measurements that are more critical than several thousanths. According to Matego, the mean difference between the A & B is .0003", more than 10x smaller than what can be measured by the average guy with a caliper. These measurements have to be taken with a micrometer. Again, attempting to take accurate measurements down to tenths is not a trivial task and beyond the capabilities of most folks.NWDirt said:You can measure the piston with a dial caliper....
No way! Assuming equivalent quality, a vernier or dial would be a better choice. Digital calipers only read to the nearest .0005 and due to display errors that's +/-.0005 on top of the basic accuracy. The average differance between the A & B is .0003 so a digital can't resolve the difference. With a vernier or dial, you can interpolate the reading down to a few tenths. But again, this is beyond reasonable accuracy for a caliper!....(digital {calipers} is better)....
Nah, don't drink coffee - that's for grown ups. I'm just trying to help some folks out while I'm killin' time waiting for my cylinder to get back from US Chrome. And I hate to see people get inaccurate info. I've done a lot of stupid things in my days and learned a lot as a result. I guess part of getting older is wanting to pass some of the hard earned experience onto others and maybe save them some of the cash and aggrivation it cost me.NWDirt said:Bunya,
Mellow out. You need to try some decaf. With so many responses in the last few weeks, you must be tired.
yeah fair point guys, after reading this again i should have said metric is easier rather than more accurate. :bang:Quote:
Originally Posted by steve.emma
....dont be sorry, metric is the most accurate way to make measurements....
Huh???? What does the unit of measure have to do with accuracy?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?