And the legally registered "cruisers" that are running around with open pipes are? UN-F*****G BELIEVABLE.:mad: Who's side are these guys on anyway?:moon: AMA :moon:The WR will not meet the EPA emissions standards for highway use
I agree with you there. In my situation, though, it makes more sense to ride the three miles to the trail than to drive. Or to ride between trails. What uses more gas and emits more pollutant: a 400 cc motorcycle or a 351 ci cargo van? Scratching my head...but without them (the AMA lobby is a good one) we will be in deep do-do.
Originally posted by dirtbike59
Hey Kevin would you mind if i sent a copy of your reply to them also. i would just change the name at the end.
It was about limiting dual sport conversions on competition bikes in order to preserve the competition bikes them selves. It also stated that "As I have often commented about the bone stock dual-sport that IOriginally posted by LocoCD
. It seems to me the salient point of the letter was preservation of access to competition level bikes and not limitations on dual sports.
Originally posted by dirtbike59
i still don't get the point of that. the only thing i get is they don't want other than dual sport models only from getting road plates. If thats the point i jusee i got the DRZ 400e and the RMX 250 road legal. And that is the nice thing about NH i don't need a dual sport light kit to get plates.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?