Originally posted by spanky250 :
"The '85 GT 5.0 made 163 hp, while the '85 SVO made 200 hp. The SVO was the car to beat in those days...if you could keep it running."
Begging to differ, but your H.P. figures are a bit off.
The figures for the GT's 302 H.O. engine were:
1982 = 157 (2v carb.)
1983 & '84 = 175 (4v carb.)
1985 = 210 (first year for roller cam & headers. last year for holley carb.)
1986 = 200 (first year for the fuelies)
1987 - until they started making the new ugly ones.= 225
True the SVO was a bit faster, but the GT was "tweakable" and much more reliable.
PS: I was in the Mustang restoration buis. for 13 years.
Originally posted by smb_racing
'96 Mazda B2300, 90k miles, replaced grille, bumper, mounts, fog lights, blend paint
whoops, I guess those problems could be attributed to operator error ;)
Yes, the turbo bearings would seize with regularity. The engine also had problems with broken camshafts, and the pressure plates tended to explode. Along with numerous other smaller problems. That little four-cylinder was yanked from an economy car, and never intended for turbo applications.Originally posted by smb_racing
if I remember correctly the SVO had terrible problems with the turbochargers.
Originally posted by 70 marlin
was just thinking? why did'nt they install a spark plug thread repair coil in the damaged head? I had the same thing happen to my aluim head four banger. blew the plug right out of the hole! went to the parts store for $25 ten min. latter it was all back to gather. the kit had these SS thread serts looked like little cones, and a over size tap that you had to grease when you cut the threads, to keep the metal chips out of the cylinder. and some loc tight red. I ran the car for anther 60,000 miles? :confused:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?