bbbom
~SPONSOR~
- Aug 13, 1999
- 2,092
- 0
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9900937/
This is a very poorly done survey (or well skewed).
===========================
Do you agree with the regulation to restrict off-road vehicles to certain parts of national forests?
Yes, all-terrain vehicles and motorized bikes are major sources of environmental damage.
No, off-roaders should be able to enjoy all areas of forests and grasslands.
===========================
The Yes choice: The question is whether off-road vehicles should have restrictions, and the answer is yes, of course, most off-roaders will agree to some regulation it's called sharing. But the second part of the "yes" answer .... a major source of environmental damage ..... that's just BS and irrelevant to the question.
The NO choice: Very few off-roaders believe that 100% free access to all areas is a good idea.
There is no good answer to this STUPIDLY constructed poll. Vote NO and vote often. Everyone vote 10 times NO.
This is a very poorly done survey (or well skewed).
===========================
Do you agree with the regulation to restrict off-road vehicles to certain parts of national forests?
Yes, all-terrain vehicles and motorized bikes are major sources of environmental damage.
No, off-roaders should be able to enjoy all areas of forests and grasslands.
===========================
The Yes choice: The question is whether off-road vehicles should have restrictions, and the answer is yes, of course, most off-roaders will agree to some regulation it's called sharing. But the second part of the "yes" answer .... a major source of environmental damage ..... that's just BS and irrelevant to the question.
The NO choice: Very few off-roaders believe that 100% free access to all areas is a good idea.
There is no good answer to this STUPIDLY constructed poll. Vote NO and vote often. Everyone vote 10 times NO.