In regards to the Yamaha spring question-
The problem of recessed valve faces is 2 fold. #1 seat material vs. ti valve material. #2 not enough spring pressure. As discussed at length previously, ti is soft and doesn't like to be run against a hard seat material. The recession problem is accelerated by insufficient spring pressure allowing the valve to bounce on that hard seat. Running a nickel bronze seat in the head will help, it won't be as brutal on the valve face, particularly in situations where the valve is bouncing on the seat. Adding some spring pressure will also help. Low pressure on a hard seat is a problem.
As near as I can tell there have been 3 generations of intake springs for the 400/426. I'll have to go back and check my notes to see which is which.
I know that some folks are running exhaust springs on everything (In the 5 valve Yamahas) because the exhaust spring has a slightly higher rate. But I don't know off the top of my head which year/model is the best way to go. But, SFO has spent a good deal of time researching the parts history on those heads and has built some. He probably has an answer for what to do until some new designs are available.
We are currently looking at (and have been for a while) all the smaller 5 valve Yamaha stuff. 250, 400, 426, and the 450. Also the R1 and FZR which are now being used in the SCCA "D" sports racer class.
The 5 valve cylinder head package is a challenge. We would like to make a dual spring for it, but, it must fit in a tight package,give a little more pressure than stock, and it has to live at those high rpms. SFO, Eric, and Rich will be among the first to know when we have something that we're satisfied with.
Regards-
Mike