I am posting this here rather than in the suspenion forum hoping to get more response specific to enduro use.
I am considering having my forks re-valved, possibly the shock as well (certainly the fork) on my 97 KTM 300Exc. I see lots of positive on MX-Tech's work here, but am considering more local options with a Race Tech dealer that is just a couple miles away, and happens to be a friend of mine. Also - Enduro Engineering is here in Michigan, and Lansing Cycle does re-valve work too... and I am frequently in their area as well.
So - I understand there seems to be differing "philosophies" on how to set up suspension based on the searchs I have done here. But are they still minor differences, and a decent re-valve by about anyone better than stock?
What is it that say Race Tech, or EE would do that would really differ from MX-Tech? How do they approach things differently?
Perhaps the conclusion might be that MX-Tech is better than Race tech, but would the Race Tech or EE still be notably better than stock?
Any specific experience with these (Race Tech, MX Tech, EE, Lansing Cycle) that someone can comment on?
I bought my bike used, and as far as I know, the suspension has never been re-built or re-valved - so is likely very worn and in need of attention (actually what prompted all this was when my fork seals started drooling recently - if I was gonna have them done, why not go all the way!)
I do think a factor might be it is good to use the local guy when you can, he has helped me out quite a few times and is good to work with... BUT - if Race Tech's specs are gonna be worse off than what I have now... thats a different story.
TIA