Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="dirt bike dave, post: 78342, member: 18302"] Jer - thanks for your input. This thread has evolved in a way that raised some questions in my mind, such as: For woods and trail, is there a diamater at which conventional forks are sufficiently rigid that they would not benefit from a brace? Are 46 - 50 mm forks stiff enough, while 41-43 mm flex too much? Does the quality of the fork tube material make a difference, or are all the forks pretty similar in tube quality? How much does bike weight effect fork flex? Can bikes with more rigid frames tolerate more fork flex and still handle well? Thanks for any information. [/QUOTE]