I'd like to say thanks to the Digi Cam Gurus!

Okiewan

Admin
Dec 31, 1969
29,550
2,238
Texas
Here's another with the Omni-bounce, this one with the flash aimed at the ceiling... diffused AND lighting mostly from above. Notice the shadow under the washcloth behind him. A straight on flash, either onboard or external would have thrown a HARD shadow behind him, an un-natural, "flash" look.
 

Attachments

  • dylan_tub1a.jpg
    94.2 KB · Views: 54

Green Horn

aka Chip Carbone
N. Texas SP
Jun 20, 1999
2,563
0
Yeah mine was with the onboard flash. I'm assuming that's why it got so bright. I know I mentioned that I've got an external flash, so I guess I'll just have to stop being lazy and put it on when I need a flash. There's an obvious difference between my pic and your pics. $21.95 for that flash diffuser??? I thought it was illegal to sell SLR camera accessories for under a gazillion dollars. :rotfl:
 

Green Horn

aka Chip Carbone
N. Texas SP
Jun 20, 1999
2,563
0
Let's see how fire ant bites look on the new camera. LOL

EDITED FOR CONTENT :yikes:
 
Last edited:

Green Horn

aka Chip Carbone
N. Texas SP
Jun 20, 1999
2,563
0
The 2nd pic shows where I was scratching in my sleep.
 

Green Horn

aka Chip Carbone
N. Texas SP
Jun 20, 1999
2,563
0
Ok, I pulled them. Not because you were eating but because Pred thinks I'm a Hobbit with those hairy feet. :(
 

Green Horn

aka Chip Carbone
N. Texas SP
Jun 20, 1999
2,563
0
So just for fun I'm still reading reviews on all the different digital SLR's. A handful of consumers actually put "Pricey" as a Con when filling out their reviews. Not saying they're wrong but c'mon now...Is Canon supposed to sell 'em for a hunnert bucks a pop? :) If you're gonna do the digital SLR thing, you can't be concerned with "pricey" items all at the same time...
 

Green Horn

aka Chip Carbone
N. Texas SP
Jun 20, 1999
2,563
0
I love photoshop... :cool:
 

Attachments

  • dad.jpg
    135.5 KB · Views: 51

Green Horn

aka Chip Carbone
N. Texas SP
Jun 20, 1999
2,563
0
My daughter wiggles her way down the bouncy seat. Kept having to watch her so she didn't wiggle right off onto the ground. LOL
 

Attachments

  • wiggler.jpg
    130.3 KB · Views: 59
Last edited:

Green Horn

aka Chip Carbone
N. Texas SP
Jun 20, 1999
2,563
0
Gotta love having a nicer camera to really bring out the browns in that nasty water. :) My son didn't seem to mind what color the water was...only that it was a fun little swimming hole.
 

Attachments

  • ick.jpg
    117.4 KB · Views: 52

Green Horn

aka Chip Carbone
N. Texas SP
Jun 20, 1999
2,563
0
Wow...once again I am humbled! :worship:
 

Green Horn

aka Chip Carbone
N. Texas SP
Jun 20, 1999
2,563
0
Okiewan said:
Now all you need is a good long lens

...Must have one...where to get?...Must get second job to afford more camera stuff. :laugh:
 

Okiewan

Admin
Dec 31, 1969
29,550
2,238
Texas
Don't be humbled, be inspired :) Trust me, there are a zillon photogs that could post a pic and make me wish I hadn't!

BTW, that fist shot a page ago was pretty damn good! Like the composition. The baby... feet are out of frame, needed to be tighter on the subject. Larger aperture on the boy would have made the bground more "blurry" (DOF) and he would pop more out of the image. Overall that image is just a little soft. Check out (google) The "Rule of Thirds" for composition.

2nd squirrel shot? Highlights are blown and distracting. Fixable in photoshop, but still...

Just keep shooting and trying different stuff! over time, you'll be in manual mode and take real control of your images.
 

Okiewan

Admin
Dec 31, 1969
29,550
2,238
Texas
As everyone told me... the camera body is the cheapest part of the hobby. Fortunately, I get paid to take pictures. Tomorrow, I'm at a ranch in Denton, shooting the big ol BBQ setup of the world champion "Texas Rib Rangers" for a "major retailer" 's magazine.

Those (the squirrel.. his name is Bill) were shot an hour ago with a Sigma 70-200 2.8 DG HSM (HUGE thanks to Chili and Lou for the scoop on that lens, the Canon L version that most say doesn't shoot any better is $1,800 the Sigma = $700.
 

Green Horn

aka Chip Carbone
N. Texas SP
Jun 20, 1999
2,563
0
Okiewan said:
Just keep shooting and trying different stuff! over time, you'll be in manual mode and take real control of your images.

Yeah, I'll admit that I'm going for the trial and error method right now. I get like one decent pic for every 8 or so I take. Then I'm left scratching my head and wondering why that ONE came out decent. LOL Rich was in the chatroom about an hr ago and he gave me some links to find more info. as well. That's the other thing I need to spend time doing is reading/ learning more about the "Rule of Thirds", aperature, shutter speed etc... and knowing what I need to do for certain types of photos. None-the-less, it's still fun playing around with "toys". :cool:

You gettin' paid? Way cool! :)
 

Green Horn

aka Chip Carbone
N. Texas SP
Jun 20, 1999
2,563
0
Not sure how this "ranks", but I'm pretty proud of how it turned out. Feel free to point anything out, as I'm cool with the "constructive criticism". :)
 

Attachments

  • angiealex.jpg
    141.1 KB · Views: 54

Green Horn

aka Chip Carbone
N. Texas SP
Jun 20, 1999
2,563
0
This one I like too, just too bad you can see the chain link in the foreground (the blurry part across running across the pic diagonally). Should've asked them to take the fence down. :rotfl:
 

Attachments

  • tiger2.jpg
    159.6 KB · Views: 71

Green Horn

aka Chip Carbone
N. Texas SP
Jun 20, 1999
2,563
0
...and this (same problem with the fence though)
 

Attachments

  • tiger3.jpg
    140.5 KB · Views: 54

Okiewan

Admin
Dec 31, 1969
29,550
2,238
Texas
Yeah, I'll admit that I'm going for the trial and error method right now. I get like one decent pic for every 8 or so I take.
That may not change substancially no matter how good you get :)

Good stuff.

Keep in mind, photographs are like art, everyone has an opinion.

The tiger. Shooting thru the fence will be a little better if you go with a larger aperture, but only to a point, it's not that bad the way you shot it, don't know how much better you could get it.

The kids. I would have probably shot that one in portrait, getting fairly close to them and all of them in the frame.
 

Green Horn

aka Chip Carbone
N. Texas SP
Jun 20, 1999
2,563
0
Okiewan said:
That may not change substancially no matter how good you get :)

Good stuff.

Thank you, sir. :) I gotta give credit where credit is due though. My wife was reading this thread last night with me and says "Hey, thanks for mentioning that I took the pics of the animals at the zoo." LOL I think if we were keeping score she's in the lead now for having better pics. After talking to her some more about how she shot the tiger through the chain link she did mention that she did use auto focus and kept hitting the button halfway until she got the auto focus where she liked it. Basically getting the tiger really focused good and barely being able to see the chain link. I'm assuming the AF was taking care of the aperature thing that you mentioned above. Here's another one she did as well using the same concept with the AF. I might just have to tell her to switch it to MF and go for it.
 

Attachments

  • leezerd.jpg
    103.2 KB · Views: 56

Green Horn

aka Chip Carbone
N. Texas SP
Jun 20, 1999
2,563
0
Apparently I didn't go through all the pics that she took of my daughter in the bouncy seat either. LOL She pointed out that she took one as a portrait shot to get her in the pic because she did infact know that the first one didn't come out right. Leave it to the wife to show me how it's done. :rotfl:
[note: I did crop it down a shade to get rid of the "wasted space" around her.]
 

Attachments

  • angie2.jpg
    135.6 KB · Views: 51
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…