georgieboy
Member
- Jan 2, 2001
- 416
- 0
Oke guys, let me try this one more time. Only i start this thread from a different angle.
To create a plush fork you tuners work with a free lift at the midvalve compression stack to provide a easy flow for the oil.
What do you think of the genius thing marzocchi did by using zero valvelift and drilling holes in the cartridge rod at progressive distances to create that plushness. So going deeper in the stroke closes more holes and thus creating more pressure on the valve stack/more damping.
Is above correct in any way, or do i miss something completely.
I just want to understand how my forks work compared to the japanese ones.
When above is true, why don't everybody use this kind of progressive free oil flow tactic to create that plush fork.
To create a plush fork you tuners work with a free lift at the midvalve compression stack to provide a easy flow for the oil.
What do you think of the genius thing marzocchi did by using zero valvelift and drilling holes in the cartridge rod at progressive distances to create that plushness. So going deeper in the stroke closes more holes and thus creating more pressure on the valve stack/more damping.
Is above correct in any way, or do i miss something completely.
I just want to understand how my forks work compared to the japanese ones.
When above is true, why don't everybody use this kind of progressive free oil flow tactic to create that plush fork.