Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Lutz, post: 189750, member: 25116"] I have a 1995 KDX 200. The only things that have ever been replaced out of necessity are the chain/sprockets, tires, and a tail light. It still has the original piston and rings, and runs great. I will probably rebuild the top end this winter, but that's only because I plan to have the engine apart anyway for some port work. I have already added Pro Circuit exhaust and boyesen reeds for more power. The bike does have good lowend grunt stock, and has good power through the rest of the revs. However, some exhaust and engine modifications really wake it up. The stock suspension is OK, but the forks tend to be way to soft for most people. In my opinion, you would be very happy with a KDX. You should be able to find one that is relatively inexpensive. The bikes are virtually identical from 1995 on up, other than graphics, so if you find an older model in good shape, you should be able to save some money for upgrades. Good luck! :) P.S. There really is no "flickability" and weight factor between the 220 and the 200. They are the SAME bike, other than the 220's larger piston and smaller carb. In stock condition, the 220 has more bottom end and the 200 has more top end. The 220 has more displacement though, and therefore more "hop-up potential." The 220 was first produced in 1997. Compared to the KTM 200 MXC, there is no comparison. The KTM 200 is a much more modern bike. It has an up-to-date suspension, chassis and engine, whereas a new KDX is based on late eighties/early nineties technology. It takes a lot of work to get the KDX into the same league with the KTM. However, KDX's are allot cheaper to buy than KTM's, so you have more left over to play with on the same budget if you buy a KDX. Also, I doubt you'll be finding a KTM 200 for under $3000. [/QUOTE]

Verification: Which ocean is California closest to?