Hi,
I sold my 1990 RMX and picked up a 1999 YZ250. Quite a different ride, I am really liking it.
How was this bike rated by the "unbiased" mags , not that it changes how I feel about it or that subjective reviews are facts but it is always nice to know. Think of it as a Trekkie wanting to know what the safe combination was on Episode xx when Kirk opened his personal safe. (does it really matter) I thought it was 24-41-11, I was way off!
Is it considered a low-mid engine bike? Since I just came off an RMX it has more instant anywhere power. Handles much better, is lighter etc. It does feel some what linear or smooth throughout the powerband. Not to much of an abrupt hit an any one spot.
What are people running for jetting on a stock engine/pipe at 2200 feet at 70F.
Any known "fixes or must replace" issues on this year of bike. Every new model has some teething problems (ie CR airbox)
Any other tips or model info would be helpful.
Thanks again DRN.
I sold my 1990 RMX and picked up a 1999 YZ250. Quite a different ride, I am really liking it.
How was this bike rated by the "unbiased" mags , not that it changes how I feel about it or that subjective reviews are facts but it is always nice to know. Think of it as a Trekkie wanting to know what the safe combination was on Episode xx when Kirk opened his personal safe. (does it really matter) I thought it was 24-41-11, I was way off!
Is it considered a low-mid engine bike? Since I just came off an RMX it has more instant anywhere power. Handles much better, is lighter etc. It does feel some what linear or smooth throughout the powerband. Not to much of an abrupt hit an any one spot.
What are people running for jetting on a stock engine/pipe at 2200 feet at 70F.
Any known "fixes or must replace" issues on this year of bike. Every new model has some teething problems (ie CR airbox)
Any other tips or model info would be helpful.
Thanks again DRN.