The riders that were invited are a little more professional than that. Kaw and Suz both had team rigs out there for the Pro quad riders as they do at all ATVA/AMA quad nationals and WPSA/ESPN Events...IndyYZ85 said:If they don't charge me more to get in, I'd be fine with it.. more to watch! I just hope they don't wear wife beaters and tote a cooler on them quads.
Thank you. That is the kind of feed back I was looking for. I was unfortunate not to make it out to this event. I heard that the track was groomed in between the quads and bikes and that on Sunday the quads went first to avoid dirtbike riders having their berms and whatnot knocked down. Did that not happen??oldguy said:Personally I prefer the quads race on their own day. This weekend was a prime example- the bikes worked up some great ruts and berms in practice and then the quads went out and knocked them all down and then polished the loose dirt off to the track edges. Same happened each time the quads went out after bike motos.
Let the quads race but on their own day when bikes are not.
In Wisconsin (district 16) very few tracks still offer a mixed schedule for this reason
You know how rumors float. They had talked about doing quads on a different day. I think it was something to do with the time line and the fact they only wanted to add in the pro class.colotowyo499 said:Motocross, like other sports of today, must be an ever-changing entity in order to survive. Even though it doesn't get as much t.v. coverage I'd like to see, the reality is spectator and media appeal at the pro level in order to satisfy sponsors. Pro hockey changed rules recently for more fan enjoyment (a.k.a. higher scoring), college football moving the kickoff line up to the 35 this year, etc. This is just the way of the sports world and we may as well make the best of it 'cuz it WILL happen, even in motocross (quads making two-tracks at Washougal). Whatever keeps our sport alive...
A separate day for quads does seem like a good compromise to a strictly two-wheeler like myself.
mtk said:Quads belong on a farm, far away from an AMA event.
Damage or alteration? What is this? Supercross?dirt bike dave said:That being said, I don't think they belong at an AMA outdoor MX. Even if they are fun to watch, any damage or alteration to the track is a bad thing.
High Lord Gomer said:mkelly...my guess is that you would be amazed (andhumbled) by how good some of those quad riders are. This past weekend I was at Durhamtown Plantation in Georgia and saw a quad rider easily clear one of the biggest jumps on the track. It is a step-up that is probably 60 feet (distance) and 10-12 feet (higher) to get to the top and another 30 or so to land smoothly down the backside. This quad rider cleared it well.
XRpredator said:Damage or alteration? What is this? Supercross?
Come on, man, alterations in the track and "damage" is what MX is all about. Adapting and overcoming a dynamic, ever-changing terrain!
I wouldn't mind watching the couches race. All the manufacturers make a 450cc performance quad these days (well, Polaris makes a KTM525 powered machine) so we'd just as well see 'em out there.
I don't believe anyone said they were easier or harder they are different is allshawnyd said:riding a quad is harder than most of you guys will admit
exactly why they destroy good lines set up by bikes. The bikes create ruts and berms that speed up the racing thus making it more competitive. the quads come out and powerslide through the corners and remove or alter. some days this makes the track less safe for bikes- I want to see fast but safe conditions. if it is a hard pack track and you add in rain or waterers you now create slick corners.when you ride a quad you try to spin out the rear tires around a corner, thus powersliding. if you dont slide you will get up on two tires and that will slow you down. on a dirtbike, you try to limit tire spin.
The track should evolve and develope new lines but why encourage good lines being destroyed? As I said ealier last Sunday at the race we were at they did run all the bike classes then put the quads onto the track. when the quads started the track was rutted and bermed- when they finished the track was smooth with very little loose dirt on top of now polished hard pack. The rest of the day the lines just never redeveloped because all that was left was the polished clean hardpack. If the track had re groomed eventually lines would develope but without the quads in there the ruts and dirt would have still been there.if you complain about the track changing, you should be doing dirt oval or something without jumps and dirt. MX is meant to see who can adapt every week or maybe even every moto if quads are allowed.
I am not saying quads should go away just they should stay away from bike race day. Give them thier own day to race and develope a fast exciting track advetageous to themIf you complain too much, maybe you should sell you dirt machine and get a rode bike. bringing the two together means more money, which means our sport will grow.
you loose me there The AMA is doing such a dismal job of leading they are doing as much damage as anyone (and this is not in relation to this particular thread)The AMA has the right idea, just no one wants to admit it...
oldguy said:I am not saying quads should go away just they should stay away from bike race day. Give them thier own day to race and develope a fast exciting track advetageous to them
oldguy said:Personally I prefer the quads race on their own day. This weekend was a prime example- the bikes worked up some great ruts and berms in practice and then the quads went out and knocked them all down and then polished the loose dirt off to the track edges. Same happened each time the quads went out after bike motos.
Let the quads race but on their own day when bikes are not.
In Wisconsin (district 16) very few tracks still offer a mixed schedule for this reason
I wasn't answerring you :coocoo: If you took the time you would see I was responding to a post from MotoSquid :)crossroadsmx said:Squid (Um whatever) .
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?