Home
Basic Dirt Bike How-To's - Video
Dirt Bike How-To's - Video
Living The Moto Life - Video
Bike Tests | Shoot-Outs - Video
Forums
What's new
Latest activity
Log-In
Join
What's new
Menu
Log-In
Join
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Close Menu
Forums
MX, SX & Off-Road Discussions
Dirt Bike Mods & Maintenance
Question of the month..!! Revisited
Reply to thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
[QUOTE="DEGBERT, post: 69683, member: 21616"] Ok, I think every one contributing to this thread has got a pretty good handle on what’s going on. Is it just me, or did anybody else notice that you keep seeing the same 5 or 6 names over and over. I don’t know about you guys, but my wife thinks I need to go to suspension junkie’s anonymous (SJA). I spend more time tinkering on my bikes than I do riding them. Ok, back to the subject, now that we have established that a high flow piston works better in the midvalve and a low flow piston works better in passive piston or base valve. But now lets see if we can look at quantifiable ratios or values instead of just saying “low flow” and “high flow” piston. If we have a 14-mm rod displacing fluid through a 28-mm base valve (00 & 01 WP forks), how do we determine the optimum area of the receiving orifices in the base valve? How about it Jeremy, throw us a bone, can you give us at least a ratio between rod area and optimal total orifice area. ------------------ [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which ocean is California closest to?
Post reply
Forums
MX, SX & Off-Road Discussions
Dirt Bike Mods & Maintenance
Question of the month..!! Revisited
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom