cleopatrisha
Member
- Dec 16, 2006
- 86
- 0
76GMC1500 said:Yeah but you can use them only for that one purpose. .
Jaybird said:The job is only as accurate as the measuring device, and the clown at the other end of it.
I am not aware of any company making thread hole specific dial indicators. Aren't these simply threaded adapters that allow an easy mount for your instrument?
I can see them being very handy, but I cannot see where they would add, or subtract, from the accuracy of the job.
Mag base is all I have ever used for that task.
QUOTE]
Jay.
Mine is made by a company named Yamaha. Part # 90890-03002. I also have one made by a company named Peacock. They are pretty old and I'm not sure if they are still available. I believe Motion Pro sells the spark plug hole type.
Having used both, I find the spark plug type much more accurate. The magnetic base type are hard to use because there are usually not any flat surfaces on the frame to mount them to and they can move or slide down unless you c-clamp the base to the frame. Also you have a conglomeration of clamps and rods attaching the dial indicator to the base and that produces movement in the reading.
The spark plug type screws directly into the plug hole and the reading is the same every revolution. No movement between the base and the dial indicator. Most of the time you don't even have to remove the gas tank.
But maybe I just need more practise. :whoa:
Jaybird said:If a Starret indicator mounted on a mag base is inaccurate, then we are all in trouble!
I also trust that I can accurately, and repeatedly, do the job without the aid of a specialized tool.
.
I think that a threaded adapter to use with a quality instrument would be the way to go.
Jaybird said:Terry, it's the "more accurate" part I have trouble with.
And I think I can visualize the form and function of a simple mounting adapter collet, without one bit of misunderstanding or misconception.
QUOTE]
Then visualize this Jay. ;)
You have a magnetic base adapter sticking to an uneven surface or c-clamped to an uneven surface. Then you have a clamp holding a rod and possibly even another clamp holding another rod that eventually attaches to a dial indicator that is located 8 to 10 to 12 inches away from the magnetic base.
With the screw-in type of adapter, you have an adapter that screws directly and solidly into the spark plug hole. Then, you have a miniature dial indicator that slips into the adapter and solidly set-screwed in place. From there the dial indicator pointer sets directly on top of the piston. No movement or monkey motion. The dial comes up to 'O' every revolution unlike the magnetic base adapter that has room to move and flex and has to be reset to 'O' every few revolutions. If someone accidently bumps the frame, the gauge doesn't move or have to be reset. Common sense tells us that the one mounted closest to the point of measurement will be the most accurate.
It is for this reason and the fact that I have used BOTH methods that I contend the screw-in type is more accurate. This is merely my opinion based on my experience with using both tools. You are more than welcome to your opinion.
Granted, like Bunya said, either tool will do the job. Were not talkin' rocket surgery here or nuthin'.
Another reason for purchasing the screw-in type is many times the timing is set while the engine is still on the bench. The screw-in adapter is quick, easy and accurate to use and is actually less money than the magnetic base and dial indicator when buying new. Also, the magnetic base adapter won't stick to an aluminum engine. This would require buying or making another adapter to mount the dial indicator to a head bolt. The Peacock screw-in kit comes with the head bolt adapter.
You can stick a fork in this one, I'm done.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?