jb_dallas said:I disagree that a 125 MX bike is a good solution. I owned a RM125 a few months ago and sold it for this exact reason...they suck on the trail. Again, it is a motocross bike designed for a track. They absolutely no bottom end power and that makes trail riding very difficult.
robwbright said:Bah, humbug.
If you learn to ride a 125 in the woods, you'll be able to ride anything, anywhere.
But yes, they have no bottom end and it is more challenging.
Jarpil said:I'm walking dirt bikes encyklopedia :)
Just for the information, would you guys explain the difference between 2 and 4 stroke? Does it behave differently in certain situations on the track? All I have heard it's more powerful then 4 stroke.
smahala1286 said:If you dont know the difference between a 2-stroke and a 4-stroke then you need to expand your encyclopedia. Haha
Yes two strokes are a lot cheaper for maintenance. 4 strokes have a wider power band and better tractability. They do behave differently from each other, with a 2 stroke you will most likely be using the clutch a lot more. 4 strokes you can be a little more relaxed and lug gears. And yes cc's for cc's a 2 stroke is more powerful, lighter and easier maintenance. I'm a fan of 2 strokes if you couldn't tell. I don't know that much about 4 strokes but hopefully I was some help.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?