Here is the law on the subject:
No-Fault Act and Off-Road Recreation Vehicles (ORV) Act, read together, demonstrate that although motorcycles designed for use on public highways must be insured, motorcycles designed for off-road recreational purposes are exempt from No-Fault Act. Nelson v. Transamerica Ins. Services (1992) 495 N.W.2d 370, 441 Mich. 508.
FWIW, I'm a lawyer in MI and the this appears to be the current state of the law. You might want to try showing this to Progressive, it is a MI Supreme Court case that is pretty specific about exempting ORV from the requirments of the no-fault statute. However, it is equally specific about including streel legal bikes in the no fault statute.
Mike F.
No-Fault Act and Off-Road Recreation Vehicles (ORV) Act, read together, demonstrate that although motorcycles designed for use on public highways must be insured, motorcycles designed for off-road recreational purposes are exempt from No-Fault Act. Nelson v. Transamerica Ins. Services (1992) 495 N.W.2d 370, 441 Mich. 508.
FWIW, I'm a lawyer in MI and the this appears to be the current state of the law. You might want to try showing this to Progressive, it is a MI Supreme Court case that is pretty specific about exempting ORV from the requirments of the no-fault statute. However, it is equally specific about including streel legal bikes in the no fault statute.
Mike F.