Originally posted by SCHLAVA
Rich I apologize if I'm coming off as rude!
Mark
Doesn't seem rude to me. You stated your opinion based on your experience. :thumb:
It's easy to forget that reliability is inversely proportional to rpm. While I have nothing but respect for the designers of these engines, the simple fact is they had to produce them at a specific price point and it shows.
Having seen the wear patterns of a lot of YZF4s and 250Fs it's IMO unwise to not pay strict attention to the service intervals. Okie's 250F is a good example. He has two seasons on it of riding every weekend on a tight SX style course that never gets the bike on the rev limiter, mixed in with a handful of longer track days on the bike. It sees good regular maintenance but we still had planned on doing the crank over the winter. Prior to DW02 I put a new top end in the bike. The old piston looked good, ring wear wasn't excessive and the valve clearance was within spec but it was clear that it needed to be freshened up.
Anyone who was at DW02 knows that Okie's bike dropped a valve. It wasn't until I got it apart that I realized why. The crank main bearings wear on these engines and it allowed the piston to valve clearance to close up at the sustained high rpm it saw at Cooperland. On one of the longer sections a valve kissed the piston and popped the keeper dropping the valve.
The tough part of this is, on a cold engine in the shop the crank and rod APPEAR to have no excessive clearance, and give no indication that it's going to cause problems. The g loads occurring at 12000+ rpm apparently had other ideas. This type of failure is extremely COMMON on the 250Fs, along with valve failures and rod failures. I'm extremely cautious about not stretching service intervals and this still caught me be surprise. Okie isn't some rev happy teenager, and he still had the crank bearings fail which lead to a failure that should have been a lot more expensive than it ended up being.
I have two junk cylinder heads that I use for flowbench development that came to me after similar crank failures, and Eric Gorr has collected a whole box full of trashed 250F parts in a similar fashion.
My point here is this, fatigue life on these parts is finite and it can get really expensive to try and stretch the life of these parts if your engine sees high rpm on a regular basis. In roadracing we kept engine hour records and tossed cranks at specific intervals wether they APPEARED worn or not because the consequences of trying to stretch the intervals was well documented and respected. IMHO, a 250F that is regularly raced needs to be treated in a similar fashion, but the exact intervals are still a matter of some debate.
FWIW, two seasons on Okie's bike wore the following parts and required replacement.
- new crank assembly (the ground bearing surfaces on the crank ends gall when the mains start to fail)
- new crank main bearings
- new trans shaft bearing (the one behind the clutch pusher wears quickly)
- the OEM Ti valves are of suspect quality for the cam dynamics used and the faces were worn to the point of needing replacement. As soon as they are available I'll be replacing the OEM Ti valves with Kibblewhite Stainless Steel valves and the matchjing springs, which will last much longer and should flow a bit better.
- balancer shaft needle bearing (I've heard from a couple of engine guys that this is pretty common)
- cam chain
- valve springs were replaced as a safety measure
- piston & rings
Just for the record I don't think any of this maintenance is unreasonable on a 13000+ rpm RACE engine. To this day I'm still amazed they can build these bikes as good as they do while selling them as cheap as they do.
One last thing, before any of you KTM zealots start yipping and humping each others legs, your engines have similar issues, the only difference is you'll need to take out a second mortgage to deal with them. :confused: