M madmike90 Member Aug 3, 2007 101 0 Oct 6, 2009 #1 i have a lead on a cr125R and rm125, both 1996 models, both bone stock and in seemingly perfect condition. my question for you guys is, which is the faster bike on the track. ill only be purchasing one or the other. were talking MX here. thanks guys, Mike
i have a lead on a cr125R and rm125, both 1996 models, both bone stock and in seemingly perfect condition. my question for you guys is, which is the faster bike on the track. ill only be purchasing one or the other. were talking MX here. thanks guys, Mike
R RM85rider123 Member Oct 28, 2007 681 0 Oct 7, 2009 #2 There both great. pick one with a blindfold on? or take the better looking one.
0 01HondaCR Member May 31, 2001 336 0 Oct 7, 2009 #3 Which ever one you feel most comfortable on will be faster.
M Matt90GT Member May 3, 2002 1,517 1 Oct 7, 2009 #4 96 was a great year for the honda for sure. Both will need maintenance and the suspension revalved if you are going to be serious about the track. I personally like the Hondas WAY better than a suzuki. Better reliability and a better overall package. But that is my opinion.
96 was a great year for the honda for sure. Both will need maintenance and the suspension revalved if you are going to be serious about the track. I personally like the Hondas WAY better than a suzuki. Better reliability and a better overall package. But that is my opinion.
2-Strokes 4-ever ~SPONSOR~ Feb 9, 2005 1,842 4 Missouri Oct 7, 2009 #5 IMO the Suzuki had better handling, but the Honda's motor ruled. '96?... I'd do the CR.
C Colorado Dirt Member Sep 24, 2009 4 0 Oct 9, 2009 #6 I have the 96 CR and I love it. I would like to get to quieter exhaust though. Go with Honda.