2strok4fun

Member
Apr 6, 2002
1,085
1
Last weekend we spent a couple nights in the SoCal desert near Ridgecrest and got what I think are some interesting night shots. The moon was nearly full and I found it interesting how the color spectrum is just like daylight.

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/2_stroke/6255963309/" title="DSC08763a by 2_stroke, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6111/6255963309_3b155d6a95.jpg" width="500" height="334" alt="DSC08763a"></a>

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/2_stroke/6255962225/" title="DSC08762r by 2_stroke, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6034/6255962225_95dacf9080.jpg" width="334" height="500" alt="DSC08762r"></a>

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/2_stroke/6255966255/" title="DSC08860r by 2_stroke, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6108/6255966255_823057b441.jpg" width="359" height="500" alt="DSC08860r"></a>
No moon and lit by the campfire
 
Last edited:

Rich Rohrich

Moderator / BioHazard
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Jul 27, 1999
22,839
16,904
Chicago
Outstanding. The clarity of the stars is really cool.
 

Okiewan

Admin
Dec 31, 1969
29,550
2,238
Texas
Amazing how many stars are out there ...

Nice shots! Makes me want to camp desert!
 

BSWIFT

Sponsoring Member
N. Texas SP
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Nov 25, 1999
7,926
43
Okiewan said:
Amazing how many stars are out there ...

Nice shots! Makes me want to camp desert!
I think the stars are out there all of the time. O:
 

2strok4fun

Member
Apr 6, 2002
1,085
1
Thanks guys,

it is a neat spot and reasonable for dark sky but still get light from Ridgecrest/china lake.

I got some new hardware, a new camera (sony a580) and a new sony 16-50 2.8 that is backordered but supposed to be really nice. All pics above were taken using my old a300 (terrible at hi iso) and an old minolta 50mm 1.7. The 50 gets nice sharp stars but I cant wait to shoot at a wider angle.

Next summer I hope to get nice Milky Way pics up in the So. Sierras where it is very good for dark sky.
 

2strok4fun

Member
Apr 6, 2002
1,085
1
ws6transam said:
How may seconds are your exposure times?

first pic 25 seconds @ f1.7 iso 100 50mm prime
second pic 20 seconds f1.7 iso 100 50mm prime
third pic 30 seconds f3.5 iso 100 18mm kit lens, this one is cheating a little on processing. I processed the same raw 2 times with different exposures, one for the rock and one for the stars, I think it ended up with about 4ev separation. The other 2 are basically just adjusted for levels.

btw, the greenish lights at the bottom of the 2nd pic are my kids running around with glow sticks and flashlights.
 

2strok4fun

Member
Apr 6, 2002
1,085
1
A couple more from the same area.

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/2_stroke/6416846565/" title="DSC00463 by 2_stroke, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7026/6416846565_bb6f62f1d7_z.jpg" width="640" height="425" alt="DSC00463"></a>

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/2_stroke/6416836109/" title="DSC00436 by 2_stroke, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7026/6416836109_b44b811a87_z.jpg" width="425" height="640" alt="DSC00436"></a>
 

High Lord Gomer

Poked with Sticks
Sep 26, 1999
11,788
35
That's amazing. We never get to see that much in the sky in the Southeast...I guess there is too much man-made light drowning it out. Very cool to see that, though!
 

2strok4fun

Member
Apr 6, 2002
1,085
1
thumbs said:
Looks familiar, almost like I was there.
yup, ;)

New lens arrives tomorrow :) More reasons to go out and lay in the dirt in the desert...
 
Top Bottom