Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="EngIceDave, post: 395846, member: 25519"] There was a test report from a well respected race team... I replied to comments about our product, that must not be allowed...unless the reply meets some type of standard that you set. We're not the only company that lets our results on the track speak for the results of our product...look at Pro-Circuit, FMF, Pro Action and many others....they let their on track performance and championships speak for itself, we're not allowed the same? One of your sponsors, Service Honda, just ordered a SUBSTANTIAL amount to be the OFFICIAL coolant product in the Service Honda AF500 for 2003 because it works for them...Keeps the temps down in their bikes, is that not a peer review or independent evaluation? How about Transworld Motocross Magazine (Which we do not advertise in, never have) giving a positive review on the product tested in a CRF450R and saying it works? Is that an independent review? That's fine. I try not to spam, only participate, but when I hear of or see a thread that makes inaccurate statements, I respond and I defend. If it comes off as spam, my apologies. The last time this happened was well over a year ago in a similar situation. I respect your "no spam" policies, I do not come to this forum and start threads "spamming" our product or to visit our site. If defending is bad, it's bad for everyone because threads will be one sided without the benefit of a differing view or the view of the manufacturer. We NEVER say anything negative about our competitors, we acknowledge that they all make fine products that work. Each just has varying benefits and drawbacks. By the tone of your replies, you obviously have a burr in your bonnet and no matter what is said, it is unsatisfactory. [/QUOTE]

Verification: Which ocean is California closest to?