Firefox 3.0

IndyMX

Crash Test Dummy

~SPONSOR~

Jul 18, 2006

5,548

2

Amo, IN

• Jun 17, 2008

• #1

Has anyone else tried Firefox 3.0 and noticed that some of the features of DRN are different?

 

whenfoxforks-ruled

Old MX Racer

~SPONSOR~

Oct 19, 2006

8,129

2

Merrillville,Indiana

• Jun 17, 2008

• #2

Odd, I used to run firefox and now I am running with frigg'in microsuk and it is different!!

 

G

georgia_tom

Member

Feb 22, 2008

47

0

• Jun 17, 2008

• #3

all i use is firefox, so i wouldn't know if it was different.

 

MXSparx

Mr. Meltsomeglass

Jul 25, 1999

3,723

71

NoVa

• Jun 17, 2008

• #4

^^^ Ditto^^^

 

I

ignition retard

Member

Dec 8, 2007

138

0

• Jun 17, 2008

• #5

I'm running firefox 3.0b5 and it looks the same as whatever version of firefox I was running before. Its not uncommon for different browsers to display things differently.

 

IndyMX

Crash Test Dummy

~SPONSOR~

Jul 18, 2006

5,548

2

Amo, IN

• Jun 17, 2008

• Thread starter
• #6

Ok.. here are a few screen shots.. 1st is the new Firefox 3.0, 2nd is Internet Exploder, 3rd is Firefox 2.0.

You can see in the menu bar, there are different options.. Or should I say, missing options in 3.0, as compared to the other two browsers.

I understand, being someone who designs websites for a living, that the different browsers will render pages differently. Firefox 3.0 is having issues with the menu on this site, and seems to be missing some of the items.

Is anyone else seeing this???

 

Attachments

• 1.jpg

  140.8 KB · Views: 101
• 2.jpg

  126.7 KB · Views: 103
• 3.jpg

  115.6 KB · Views: 106

Okiewan

Admin

Dec 31, 1969

29,550

2,238

Texas

• Jun 17, 2008

• #7

2.x shows it correctly. 3.0 isn't a Mac version ... seems like a good thing :)
No way to keep up with all the contenders.

3.X apparently doesn't like the jscript drop down (active topics). Which, is written to standard.

 

IndyMX

Crash Test Dummy

~SPONSOR~

Jul 18, 2006

5,548

2

Amo, IN

• Jun 17, 2008

• Thread starter
• #8

Okiewan said:

2.x shows it correctly. 3.0 isn't a Mac version ... seems like a good thing :)
No way to keep up with all the contenders.

3.X apparently doesn't like the jscript drop down (active topics). Which, is written to standard.

Click to expand...

Hmm... well, I'll have to check the settings on the new browser, it may have restrictions on javascript.

Thanks for the tip..

 

I

ignition retard

Member

Dec 8, 2007

138

0

• Jun 18, 2008

• #9

Your 3.0 is displaying extra stuff also like "new posts" "mark forums read" and "open buddy list"
Here's a pic of mine.
<br>
<img src="http://www.lakimau.com/pics/ff3.png" border="0" alt="">

 

IndyMX

Crash Test Dummy

~SPONSOR~

Jul 18, 2006

5,548

2

Amo, IN

• Jun 18, 2008

• Thread starter
• #10

That probably has to do with my subscription level.

 

Okiewan

Admin

Dec 31, 1969

29,550

2,238

Texas

• Jun 18, 2008

• #11

Update...
3.0 for the Mac released; no issues I can find with display.

 

IndyMX

Crash Test Dummy

~SPONSOR~

Jul 18, 2006

5,548

2

Amo, IN

• Jun 18, 2008

• Thread starter
• #12

Just discovered that the problem related to a setting I had that altered the useragent that Firefox reported (general.useragent.override).

I had it setup so that I could download and use addons that were reported to not work with 3.0.. Some will still work, even though they aren't supposed to.

Anyway, when I had that set in the Firefox config, it fubar'd the menu on here, take the setting out, all better.

 

I

ignition retard

Member

Dec 8, 2007

138

0

• Jun 18, 2008

• #13

IndyMX said:

That probably has to do with my subscription level.

Click to expand...

I was just comparing the differences in the pics that you put up.