BadgerMan
Mi. Trail Riders
- Jan 1, 2001
- 2,479
- 10
This is really bugging me. What do you think about this?
My wife and I both work full time and have access to pretty decent health insurance plans. Historically, her plans have been more affordable (the premium co-pay) than my employer’s offerings so I have opted out and my coverage has been through her employer (denoted as ________ in the following letter).
Recently, the VP of Human Resources from her company sent the following letter to employers in the area (mine included) explaining their plans to add a surcharge for covering spouses who have the option to acquire coverage elsewhere. I think this is just plain dirty and may become a trend. I suspect that when other employers see this happening, they will follow suit.
:pissed:
My wife and I both work full time and have access to pretty decent health insurance plans. Historically, her plans have been more affordable (the premium co-pay) than my employer’s offerings so I have opted out and my coverage has been through her employer (denoted as ________ in the following letter).
Recently, the VP of Human Resources from her company sent the following letter to employers in the area (mine included) explaining their plans to add a surcharge for covering spouses who have the option to acquire coverage elsewhere. I think this is just plain dirty and may become a trend. I suspect that when other employers see this happening, they will follow suit.
To Whom it May Concern:
Effective January 1, 2007, the cost of coverage under _______’s plan will significantly increase for the spouses of _______ employees who have health insurance coverage available from their employers. Your employee (our employee’s spouse) previously declined coverage under your company’s group health plan. They declined coverage under your plan because at the time they could have enrolled, they were covered as primary under the _______ group health plan as the spouse of an _______ employee.
Under the terms of _______’s plan, an employee’s spouse who is entitled to elect coverage under his or her employer’s health plan but does not elect such coverage must pay a monthly, after-tax surcharge of $100 in order to remain in _______’s plan. This surcharge of $1,200 per year is in addition to the monthly employee contribution for health plan coverage. Therefore, your employee’s current coverage costs will be increased significantly effective January 1, 2007 if they are not covered under your company’s group health plan as of that date.
This significant increase in the cost of health insurance benefits provided to spouses under _______’s health plan will effectively terminate the ability of most spouses to participate in _______’s plan beginning January 1, 2007, by pricing them out of coverage under the plan. This is, in effect, a loss of health insurance coverage. As your employee, who is otherwise eligible for coverage under your company’s plan, this effective loss of coverage should permit them to elect a special enrollment in your group plan with primary coverage beginning January 1, 2007 (the date on which coverage will effectively terminate for them under _______’s plan). They should also be permitted to change any previous cafeteria plan elections that may be affected by this special election of coverage under your group health plan.
Your prompt cooperation in assisting with your employee’s entry into your plan is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
:pissed: