Well I would like to start of saying there were more twists in this meeting than a roller coaster. Ill point this out, there was a survey sent out to about 600 residents I believe? And GUESS WHAT? we show up to the little town hall and there was about 250 upset snowmobilers, quaders, bikers etc... A lot of these people were upset because they never even got the survey. In the room about 60+ people were 100% positive they didn't receive it. (There reasoning,(the ministers) "well we did our best, some obviously fell through the cracks"...yea right) Now they had the results layed out and they made it seem like everyone was in favour of the ban yet if you broke down there little percentages they encoded it was typically a 10-15 person varience between strongly agree and stongly disagree. Meaning if those 60+ people who never even got a chance to respond the results would have been in our favour.
Now to add the icing on the cake. The survey had asked questions like
Do you feel OHV vehicles are doing damage to certain areas of property?
Well even the people who ride OHV's know that they do some damage, so of course some people said yes. But ahh! this is where the trickery comes in, this survey was going to be the final outcome of the decision but it never said this ONCE on the actual survey. So what I am saying is, we were tricked, they took that information and basically used it against us and said "ok they are bad they wreck land ban em" The consensus of the group was that they would realize there was a problem and help solve it, not flat out ban it
Pretty dirty if you ask me.....
So then we have all these people at the meeting, and the 3 ministers or whatever they were, told us the meeting would have NO impact on there decision and that they would bring the survey results to council regardless on what we had to say. No if's and's or butts. Now another twist once again. There were very few people who were for the ban there, (10-12 people) now about 8 of them were so old they could barely walk.....And I don't mean to sound rude but when they stated there case they made no sense at all.... (blatent lies like dirtbikers ride at 3 in the morning lighting fires) When I asked how that was possible when they have no lights etc...they stuttered and told me they can see in the dark :( I could hear one old women behind me who was saying how all riders are evil, and that they are out to get her and her husband??? it was sad they had no idea and just made stuff up. It was hard to face these people and smile but I still did because I won't give in to there rediculous stereotypes. Now the people that we could understand made a good point, they said "If this is a strictly YES OR NO decision than they would say YES ban them, BUT if they could have had the option to come to an agreement (collectively agree on hours of operation, clean up crews etc...) then they would have said NO don't ban them. So once again the survey screwed us all over, there was not ONE SINGLE question that said "would you be willing to come to an agreement" everything was yes or no. Compromise was NEVER even mentioned on the survey. EVER!
Brilliant ideas were brought up at this meeting, yet they had no dictator at all. :whiner:
However was it a waste? I don't think so, we realized the board that set this up, out of 12 members 3 own OHV'S and NONE of them live in our area. So we said what are you going to do when the ban goes to your area? The point was brought up that if they ban our area the problem will just get pushed to the other side of the river and become someone else's problem. Once again the "ministers" never thought of this one :silly:
Lastly one main point that was brought up was that it's mainly the people in the city that cause the problems. Why would people who live in the valley wreck there own land? THEY WON'T, of course there will be 1 or 2 bad people but that's beside the issue. It's the staging area where people from the city come to and rip up the field, drink beers and ride sleds etc... Once again this WAS NEVER ADDRESSED in the survey, most of the respondents thought they were being asked about those type of problems. They wanted a solution not a total ban.
So what's the outcome? There was outrage, we decided no one was leaving until something was going to happen. They could feel our rage. We were told if we want to stop the motion send in faxes and letters to the main offices's. (My letter is being typed as I type this) I have all names and numbers as do the other 200+ members yesterday, we will be heard and this will be stopped. The survey was irresponsbly written and tricked people into something that was never even mentioned. I don't know much about politics but there is going to be a plebicite held? But all I can say, is there was energy in this meeting. Many people had said we moved to the country to ride, we have lived here for 30+ years and have rode every season, if some people didn't see all the tracks, trails etc..when they had moved in to the country they should not have come to complain. We are the tax payers and it's our right. So all I can is this will be stopped. No matter how much fighting I have to do....They won't take away my right to ride.
If anyone actually read this whole thing, thanks for taking the time. If what we do is so bad, then whatever condemn me. What we do brings us together even closer as a society. I have built stronger morels, values and learned a lot of essential things in life through riding. Some of my best memories I have as a child is riding on the river with my dad on our ski-doo. Now one day if I have kids, NO ONE will take this right from them, this is a free country. I want them to enjoy their lives and learn some of the good things I have learnt. Like I said no one will take away my rights :D