- Dec 26, 1999
- 19,774
- 0
- Thread starter
- #26
The judgement was not snap, I thought about it and the longer I did the more upset I became. Obviously the stupid expectation that there should always be somebody to pull another persons butt out of the fire is wider spread than I considered. Also I believe I stated "In my eyes..." Perhaps it was difficult to understand but I was in fact stating my opion so yes I believe my judgement of his being equal to floating fecal matter is quite accurate. I had no intention of trying to convince anybody of my experience needing to be legitimized by some comparison, which perhaps you missed this little tid bit as well, but I don't recall stating my vacation was cut short? Can you point me to this or is theis another fact grasped from the air? The precise fact is that my family and the family we were traveling with stay through the storm in a shelter, we then returned to our trashed accomidations and cleaned them up ourselves, and believe it or not stayed through our original departue date. Does that matter? Only in that we chose to follow the directions given to insure our security. We did not take anything beyond our clothes and medications because believe it or not even though none of our things were insured they were all just things, life itself is more important, both our AND those who were there to assist. So the bottom line is I did assume the individual had some idea that if they are told of a manditory evacuation then maybe it's going to be bad stuff coming their way and all the crap in the world isn't worth dying for. That is something that aparently became obvious when he made the call.
Now about those snap judgements, it seems to be going around doesn't it?
BTW, yes I am a kook! :laugh:
Now about those snap judgements, it seems to be going around doesn't it?
BTW, yes I am a kook! :laugh: