Originally posted by MWEISSEN
... I think single track was defined as 28"...
Argos are either 6 or 8 wheeled vehicles, and the seat is a bench-type, and is not straddled.A 3 or 4 wheeled vehicle that is designed for off-road use, that has low-pressure (balloon-type) tires, with a seat that is designed to be straddled by the operator, powered by an engine in size from 50 cc on up to 500 cc displacement.
Senator Valde Garcia... said:Thank you for your recent e-mail regarding Senate Bill 110, which would change the definition of forest trail to accomodate Off Road Vehicles of 57" or less. I appreciate you contacting me to get an update on the legislation.
I am continuing my efforts to pass Senate Bill 110. I realize that there are some people that have concerns about this bill, and I have been working with the Department of Natural Resources to address those concerns since the bill's introduction. I believe that it is important to provide an adequate forum for all sport riders to enjoy their sport. I also believe that this bill can be crafted in a way to make that happen without compromising the utility of the existing trails or costing the state an excessive amount of money.
Again, thank you for your input. If there is anything more that I can do to be of assistance to you, please feel free to contact me.
Saw a 3-page thread over on the Michigan Jeepers forum about this Argo bill. At first they were all excited about it thinking they'd be able fly down the wider trails with their CJ-7s, then realized that their Jeeps are slightly wider than the proposed 57". More here...rickshaw said:... I'll talk to Ron Mollitor and see how he would like to coordinate a meeting. Details to follow!
Michigan DNR Press Release said:
State of Michigan
JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM
governor
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Lansing
K. L. COOL
director
February 20, 2003
1. Bill Number and Sponsor
Senate Bill No. 110
Introduced by Senators Garcia and Leland
2. Purpose
Senate Bill No. 110 would amend Part 811, "Off-Road Recreation Vehicles" (ORV), of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, by amending Section 81101 and 81123 (MCL 324.81101 and 324.81123) to:
· Redefine the definition of “Forest Trail”. It would increase trail width from less than 50 inches to 57 inches, or less.
· Remove current date reference in statute (Section 81123) for completion of comprehensive plan and designation of scramble area(s) in the northern Lower Peninsula and southeast Michigan.
3. How Does This Legislation Impact Current Programs in the Department?
This legislation will have significant impact on the programs of the Department. This bill would require widening over 1,709 miles of designated State Forest trails and 466 miles of National Forest trails to accommodate vehicles greater than 50 inches in width.
4. Introduced at Agency Request
No.
5. Agency Support
No.
6. Arguments Against the Bill
From its inception, the ORV trail system was intended, designed, and designated for vehicles less than 50 inches in width. If this legislation is passed, virtually every ORV trail in the State would have to be widened. This work would include tree and stump removal and, in many circumstances, actual trail bed construction. This effort would require significant time, planning, and expense above and beyond the normal funding and maintenance performed by volunteers through the ORV grant program. Trail managers and trail riding interest groups are concerned that trail widening may also diminish user satisfaction and increase resource impacts.
7. Arguments for the Bill
Senate Bill 110 would provide additional off-road trail riding opportunities for vehicles 57 inches in width, or less.
8. State Revenue/Budgetary Implications
Trail manager’s estimate approximately $5.4 million dollars would be needed to accomplish initial trail widening efforts.
This is a conservative estimate based on the following assumptions:
· Approximately twenty five percent (25%) of the trail system would require significant trail widening.
· Contracts for tree removal, trail bed construction, bridge and culvert improvements would be required.
· Field verification and environmental assessments by department staff is needed in order to determine actual needs and budget implications.
· Real costs may be higher or lower based on field verification.
9. Implications to Local Units of Government
None.
10. Administrative Rules Implications
While this legislation would have minimal implications on Administrative Rules, it would supercede current rules that define minimum width of “Forest Trail”.
11. Other Pertinent Information
The Department facilitates access to State lands for recreation by vehicles greater than 50 inches in width.
Current practice allows these vehicles to travel on:
· 380 miles of designated ORV Route in the northern Lower Peninsula
· 2,198 acres of ORV designated scramble area in the northern Lower Peninsula (i.e. Silver Lake State Park, St. Helen Motorsport Area)
· 165 miles of designated ORV Route in the Upper Peninsula
· 2,376 miles of State Forest roads in the Upper Peninsula
· 7,000 miles of National Forest roads in the Upper Peninsula
12. User Groups/Customers that Support this Legislation (if known)
The Michigan Motorcycle Dealers Association supports the legislation.
The following organizations oppose the proposed legislation:
· Cycle Conservation Club of Michigan
· Michigan All-Terrain Vehicle Association
K. L. COOL
DIRECTOR
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?