Important MI Single-Track Legislation

MWEISSEN

Whaasssup?
Mi. Trail Riders
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Dec 6, 1999
2,233
0
Smit-dog, I looked for an answer to your question on the DNR site, but I couldn't find the definition. I sent for the entire set of State of Michigan maps, which included a pamphlet on the definition, but I pitched the pamphlet (silly now, I guess). From memory, I think single track was defined as 28", but am really not sure. F&S will certainly know.

If y'all haven't taken advantage of the "order maps" link on the DNR site, you should do so! You can get a full set of Michigan maps for the asking. Including the pamphlet I lost.

I did notice on the DNR site that there's $1.37M of grants for ORV trail maintenance, development and legal enforcement for 2003.
 

Smit-Dog

Mi. Trail Riders
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Oct 28, 2001
4,704
0
Thanks MW. I did as much searching as my sore little eyes could handle, and I read through all the DNR ORV pamphlets that I had. (The ORV pamphlet is available online, BTW). They define trail/route, but within the "trail" spec, other than the current 50" maximum, I couldn't find anything specific to single track.

I just want to make sure that we're not getting our panties in an uproar if this bill ultimately doesn't affect us. Other than allowing a slightly wider ATV on existing ATV-designated trails, single track will not be affected. Unless there are not any hard and fast rules/policies in place to protect motorcycle-only trail designations, please tell me what I'm missing here.

The DNR site is great. I also found meeting minutes posted from the monthly ORV Trails Advisory Board meeting. F&S was representing, and like he said earlier, there were a vocal bunch of 4x4 types there whining about being overlooked by the DNR.
 
Last edited:

Smit-Dog

Mi. Trail Riders
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Oct 28, 2001
4,704
0
Originally posted by MWEISSEN
... I think single track was defined as 28"...

But doesn't the max width specification refer to the vehicle width, not the trail width? Yes? No?

Maybe single track is designated for "2-wheeled" vehicles under 40"? The bars on my bike are at about 32".

:think:
 

fatherandson

Mi. Trail Riders
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Feb 3, 2001
3,818
0
I have not read a copy of the bill yet.  I have been doing more talking than reading (so far). 

The trail width clearance does vary by the type of trail.  The motorcycle trail needs to be cleared at the ground to 24" and 40" at the handlebar.  The All Terrain trail needs to be cleared to 50" from top to bottom.  FYI.  The majority of the trail around LMC is considered ATV (not bike trail).   The ORV route needs to be cleared to 72".  The heigth clearance is 8 ft.

I am looking for more information on the counter proposal about opening more of the forest roads in the lower pennisula.

 
 

MWEISSEN

Whaasssup?
Mi. Trail Riders
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Dec 6, 1999
2,233
0
One thing I did notice on the DNR site was that ATV's were defined as having engines 50 to 500 cc's. Does that make the new Bombardier DS650 and the Yamaha Raptor (660?) illegal on ATV trails??? Hmmm....
 

Smit-Dog

Mi. Trail Riders
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Oct 28, 2001
4,704
0
And the DNR definition of an ATV specifically states:
A 3 or 4 wheeled vehicle that is designed for off-road use, that has low-pressure (balloon-type) tires, with a seat that is designed to be straddled by the operator, powered by an engine in size from 50 cc on up to 500 cc displacement.
Argos are either 6 or 8 wheeled vehicles, and the seat is a bench-type, and is not straddled.

So even if the bill, as worded today, is passed, Argos will not be able to ride on anything other that an ORV "Route".

And F&S, what you're saying is that most of the trails that I've been on around LMC are ATV trails? I'm usually so busy trying to keep up that I don't remember the sign designations as to cycle-only or cycle/ATV. Seems like a lot of those trails around LMC are too narrow for a quad, so I assumed they were cycle-only.

:think:
 

fatherandson

Mi. Trail Riders
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Feb 3, 2001
3,818
0
Just to clarify, there are 75 miles of trail from 131 to the Higggins Lake loop (NOT including the 45 miles of the Higgins Lake loops) and this includes two loops of trail.  The two loops of trail (15 miles total) are the cycle only trail for this section of the MCCCT.  The other 60 miles are cycle and ATV trail according to the DNR.

I will attempt to attach a map from the DNR website to help show where these loops of trails are located.

http://www.dnr.state.mi.us/spatialdatalibrary/pdf_maps/trail_maps/orv/missaukee.pdf
 

rickshaw

Sponsoring Member
Sep 24, 2000
404
0
I'm still working on this and swapping voice mail messages Valde and his "scheduler" Brett.

We have the support of the CCC from Ron Mollitor and Bill Chapin who are very interested in attending the meeting when it happens.

Our letters are getting the message through to Valde Garcia and he appears to be concerned with the cost of widening the trail and safety.

Details to follow and for those of you who have not sent letters, get em in the mail today :o

rickshaw
 

tripdog7

Member
Oct 3, 2002
47
0
I agree with Smit about finding what the true impacts if this bill passed both houses and was signed by Granholm. (remember, any congressman can add or modify this original bill as it passes through committees)

Based on the Michigan legislature website, this is what I read:

Section 81101 is revised.

Line (f) is now:
"Forest trail" means a designated path or way capable of travel only by a vehicle less than 50 inches in width.

Line (f) would be:
"Forest trail" means a designated path or way capable of travel only by a vehicle 57 inches or less in width.

Line (v) is:
"Trail improvement fund" means the ORV trail improvement fund created pursuant to section 81117.

Line (v) would be:
"Trail improvement fund" means the ORV trail improvement fund created under section 81117.

Section 81123 just eliminates old target dates to a generic statement.

I don't know the senator's intent, but I see it as A) widening the "Forest trail" by 7 inches, and B) Instucting the "department" to further work on trail develpment and scramble areas. If anyone hears what the bill's sponsers intentions are, enlighten us.
 

bbartol88

Member
Apr 20, 2002
6
0
Several of the loops in the state have single track trails that run alongside the wider ORV Trails. One example of this is the Meadows system. At the Meadows there is a single track trail running usually about 50 feet from the ORV Trail. This allows for both types of trails, in the same land footprint. Everybody is happy, at very little additional cost, considering the single track is not usually "built" but just ridden in. I am not sure why all of the trails are not created like this.
 

rickshaw

Sponsoring Member
Sep 24, 2000
404
0
Tripdog7, welcome aboard and excellent points on SB 110.

I hope to talk to Garcia today in an attempt to coordinate a meeting. Keep the information coming and we will assemble a detailed presentation.

And if you're not doing anything on Saturday, come up to Gladwin and freeze your but off with fellow Michigan DRN'ers.

rickshaw
 

rickshaw

Sponsoring Member
Sep 24, 2000
404
0
Talked with Brett yesterday for about 30 minutes. They are very aware of interest on this bill through the CCC members, yourselves, and ??? Michigan ATV Organization.

Their next step is to coordinate a meeting within the next 45 days with all concerned parties to understand concerns and alternate solutions. Brett did say nothing will happen with this bill until all parties are given a chance to present their issues.

He also used the "A" word...Argo. I siezed the opportunity to ask him if he was familiar with the Argo percentage of the states ORV population. He was not and very surprised at my swag of .04% ( thanks Smitdog ). And he even chuckled with my backhanded comment about the Guv acquiring an Argo!

It appears that they are interested in options to reduce cost to taxpayers and safety, while providing access to these behemoth's of an ORV. I provided Brett with the contact information for Ron Mollitor - CCC Prez and Bill Chapin - Ex. Director of the CCC. He had another CCC leaders name who is equally engaged in changing this bill.

That's it from the hill today, time to pack for ridin' tomorrow!

rickshaw
 
Last edited:

Smit-Dog

Mi. Trail Riders
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Oct 28, 2001
4,704
0
:thumb:

I posted a sign in my front yard "Rick 'Racer' Shaw for State Senator" in my front yard.

My neighbors are asking how they can contribute to your PAC. When's the fund raiser at the club house?

:thumb:
 

Smit-Dog

Mi. Trail Riders
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Oct 28, 2001
4,704
0
Ricky - Are you back from the land of sun and oranges? Did you pick out your retirement home? ;)

Any news from your golfing buddy Senator Garcia? It's been a month so thought I'd shoot this back up on Page 1.

We saw some Argo tracks on the trails this past weekend, but no sign of the Governor... :think:
 

rickshaw

Sponsoring Member
Sep 24, 2000
404
0
Billy, got back last night. Still sore from the semi annual St. Lucie Inlet Watercaft Launch Site for retired pwc racers...

I have not heard from Garcia's office and will call tomorrow.

Details to follow.

So you were riding last weekend???

rickshaw
 

Smit-Dog

Mi. Trail Riders
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Oct 28, 2001
4,704
0
You still racing/riding stand-up PWC? Cool! Rode them a lot as a kid - like dirt bikes on water. Remind me to tell you about jet skiing at Lake Powell.

I have not heard from anyone on the 7 letters I sent out. :think:

Did some trail maintenance last weekend around Moorstown w/ Napper, Fred, F&S, Drew/Dad, and a few LMC members. Look for the new stop signs - you can't miss them!
 

rickshaw

Sponsoring Member
Sep 24, 2000
404
0
Well, this one is on the back burner for now according to Valde Garcia's aide Brett. They are focusing 100% on the budget for Jenny.

I was impressed that he remembered me and even spit off my phone number. They have asked the DNR to investigate the feasibility of this bill and make alternate recommendations. I called Mike Maurer to head em' off at the pass with his DNR contacts who will ask the field operations to respond.

Brett assured me that there will be a forum to present options with attendance by the CCC, some ATV group, myself and anyone interested. There were many references to "alternative solutions" made by Brett.

And of course it wouldn't be a rickshaw conversation without a little cynical remark " hey why don't ya offer the 6 Argo owners in the state to attend the meeting." He got the point.

rickshaw
 

Smit-Dog

Mi. Trail Riders
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Oct 28, 2001
4,704
0
Well, it's been almost 9 months since this issue was last visited. I recently checked up on the status of SB 0110, hoping that it was dead. It appeared to still be held up in committee, so I sent Senator Garcia an e-mail asking about the status of the proposed legislation, as well as re-iterating my strong opposition to the bill.

Here is his response (complete with misspellings)...


RickShaw.... Time to put down your snowboard and place another call to your buddies over at Senator Garcia's office. How about getting that "meeting of the minds" set up, along with CCC representation?
 
Last edited:

rickshaw

Sponsoring Member
Sep 24, 2000
404
0
I'll talk to Ron Mollitor and see how he would like to coordinate a meeting.

It's amazing that our state government doesn't have more important legislation than this!

Details to follow!
 

Smit-Dog

Mi. Trail Riders
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Oct 28, 2001
4,704
0
rickshaw said:
... I'll talk to Ron Mollitor and see how he would like to coordinate a meeting. Details to follow!
Saw a 3-page thread over on the Michigan Jeepers forum about this Argo bill. At first they were all excited about it thinking they'd be able fly down the wider trails with their CJ-7s, then realized that their Jeeps are slightly wider than the proposed 57". More here...

-> http://www.michiganjeepers.com/foru...pe=&olderval=&oldertype=&bodyprev=#Post367853

Called Garcia's office today. His "scheduler" Robin is out until next week. The intern who answered the phone said to call back next week to set up a meeting through Robin to discuss the merits of the bill with Senator Garcia.

Let's do this before riding season... I've started drafting an opposition statement letter. Also found a press release from the DNR regarding the proposed bill. The initial estimate is that it will cost $5.4 MILLION to widen the trails. :|

-> DNR Press Release Link: http://www.michigandnr.com/legislation/position/SB 110 Analysis.htm


DRN statement on Argo use on state land:

http://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0,1607,7-153-10365_15070-73964--,00.html
 
Last edited:

Smit-Dog

Mi. Trail Riders
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Oct 28, 2001
4,704
0
Spoke with Robin, Senator Garcia's assistant.

Dates tentatively open to meet:

- Friday, March 12, anytime after 12pm.

- Monday, March 15, open all day.

- Friday, March 19, anytime after 2pm.

These are days that the senator is out in the district. We could get together for a breakfast / lunch meeting, or we could meet at the Genoa Township Hall.

Rick - Can you meet any of these days? Can you contact Ron Mollitor and see if he can meet as well?

Anyone else in the area (F&S ?) that would like to attend, please let me know.
 

rickshaw

Sponsoring Member
Sep 24, 2000
404
0
I just left a message for Ron Mollitor on his work number. He expressed interest in the past and I'm sure he'll be interested if available.

Details to follow!
 

Smit-Dog

Mi. Trail Riders
LIFETIME SPONSOR
Oct 28, 2001
4,704
0
By all means! :thumb:

Senator Valde Garcia
District 22
PO Box 30036
Lansing, MI 48909-7536
(517) 373-2420
senvgarcia@senate.michigan.gov

Senator Burton Leland
District 5
PO Box 30036
Lansing, MI 48909-7536
(517) 373-0994
senbleland@senate.michigan.gov

Send a letter to Garcia (bill sponsor) and Leland (co-sponsor), as well as your district representative. Find your district rep and contact info here:

http://senate.michigan.gov/SenatorInfo/find-your-senator.htm

Thanks Racer!

(BTW, Garcia is a HIM, not a HER).
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…