Inverted vs. Converntional Forks

R

Rich P

Member

Jan 19, 2005

4

0

• Jan 19, 2005

• #1

Sold my 94 KDX200. Looking to by a 01 KDX220. My old bike had inverted forks. They only thing bugging me about buying this newer KDX is the coverntional forks. How good are these forks compared to my old ones? Are my concerns legit.? I trail ride and occasional Hare Scramble

 

R

Rich P

Member

Jan 19, 2005

4

0

• Jan 19, 2005

• Thread starter
• #2

CONVENTIONAL Forks

 

Zerotact

~SPONSOR~

Dec 10, 2002

1,001

0

• Jan 19, 2005

• #3

the KDX forks are spring for 130lb rider, I had mine re-spring and in 2 years I have never had a leaky seal My inverted forks always leak

 

Lorin

LIFETIME SPONSOR

Jun 25, 1999

948

0

• Jan 21, 2005

• #4

one isnt necessarily any better than the other for what you are doing. Many trail riders praise the conventional forks because they "flex" more and help the ride. Inverted forks are generally larger in daimeter and have less fork flex, which provides more rigidity (and some would say control). As to the kdx forks, I like the conventional forks. With the rubber booties on them, a leaking fork seal rarely happens.

 

BadgerMan

Mi. Trail Riders

Jan 1, 2001

2,479

10

• Jan 21, 2005

• #5

My son has a 2000 KDX200. We've added heavier springs and Race Tech Goldvalves. The forks work very well.

I prefer USD forks and personally believe that the steering is more precise.......especially in sand. If I were riding somewhere else (besides Michigan), I may rethink my preferences.