So I got my KDX220 - a 2000 in very nice condition - bone stock. Went riding yesterday and let a buddy ride my '97 XR400 - also stock, w/o baffle.
I started off on the KDX and was just amazed at how easy it is to ride and how much faster you can corner and run through sand whoops. It's also way easier/more stable to ride in loose sand.
Then we traded for a while. The XR is much more tiring to ride fast, and you can't carry as much speed (reasons above). However, it does have tons more torque than the KDX (dyno'd at 46ft-lb at the wheel!). After riding the KDX, the instant torque of that bike is really amazing. BUT - you can't use it for long unless you're in a really open area. Either bike will quickly get you going faster than conditions permit. The XR is better for turf/terrain destruction and road use. The KDX is WAY better for everything else, and much more fun.
As a matter of fact, my buddy who was considering buying the XR is now going to look for a KDX! - awsome bike!
I started off on the KDX and was just amazed at how easy it is to ride and how much faster you can corner and run through sand whoops. It's also way easier/more stable to ride in loose sand.
Then we traded for a while. The XR is much more tiring to ride fast, and you can't carry as much speed (reasons above). However, it does have tons more torque than the KDX (dyno'd at 46ft-lb at the wheel!). After riding the KDX, the instant torque of that bike is really amazing. BUT - you can't use it for long unless you're in a really open area. Either bike will quickly get you going faster than conditions permit. The XR is better for turf/terrain destruction and road use. The KDX is WAY better for everything else, and much more fun.
As a matter of fact, my buddy who was considering buying the XR is now going to look for a KDX! - awsome bike!