Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Okiewan, post: 1044362, member: 16119"] This post being here and being discussed is getting the word out I think... if you have suggestions how to increase it, I'm all ears. Money has indeed been donated, you shouldn't make assumptions :) I don't think there is anyone on the site or the many others like it, that want to see another track closed. For selfish reasons alone I know I don't want McAfee to close, means another hour of driving each way to get to a good track. It's just at times, you've got to get past the emotional side of things to see the reality. It very well may be that the track is too close to town. If that's the case, this is a losing battle, no matter how much we dislike it, no matter how many people show up in court, no matter how mcuh $$ we donate. I mean, it's a couple blocks away... don't say I've got a negitive attitude, or don't care, it's just sometimes "real" slaps you in the face. People that have a REAL investment in that area have a right not to be annoyed by someone running a business. Loss of hearing, yeah, that's crap, but it's stuff like that that will get the court's attention. Imagine your home within ear shot, someone comes over to see your house for sale and hears 20 bikes out there tearing up the track. Is that right? These people could have LARGE $$ at stake, not just the possibility of losing a place to ride. Again, maybe it's best for him to save the legal fees, sell the land to those that want it, get some more land and start another track... OUT OF TOWN. Maybe there will be a compromise? More limited hours? Stock exhaust requirements? And that goes for the 2-strokes with no silencer packing. More watering the track for dust control? [/QUOTE]

Verification: Which ocean is California closest to?