After a 98 yz400f and an 02 426f, I moved back to 2-stroke. They were really good bikes in both durability and performance, but my honest opinion after 5 years riding thumpers is that they are no better or worse than 2-strokes. There are pros and cons to either one. Both are very fast, reliable and race proven. 4-Strokes: Sooth power, Massive torque, long service life, good hole-shot machines, feel girthier, harder to work on, more complicated and expensive, will NEVER start as easy as 2-stroke when hot. Hop up parts prices,especially pipes, are ridiculous. And last but not least, one wont outlast the other in the long run. 2-stroke: lighter feel , easy to work on, less rocket science, super leaping ability from short approaches, start hot cold tired rider or whatever, must concentrate more on clutch and brake timing, re-build [ only slightly if at all ] more often. I do believe the mags are 100% pro thumper, but i also know alot of people who are jumping back off the thumper bandwagon.