In a nutshell, the problem now is we've become a country of paper traders. We make NOTHING. We move paper,borrow money and leverage debt. The financial game playing is catching-up with us quickly. The power of the USA is our buying power. We consume like no other. Problem is? We are all out of credit.
The Record of the Federal Reserve. . .
- Thread starter robwbright
- Start date
Greatly reduce the number of hands in the pot, 50 representatives from each state goes to Washington. Retire like everybody else, 20~25 years of service, THEN you get the fat pension. No aids, assistants, Nada. Criminalize lobbying. No more electoral college putting the president in. Boot out the illegal immigrants and seal the border already! The feds would save so much money just in Washington DC its absolutely asinine. Then come the human and animal, global warming groups, no more than sleeper terrorist organizations hell bent on removing American freedom.
truespode
Moderator / Wheelie King
- Jun 30, 1999
- 7,984
- 251
Okiewan said:
100% spot on.
In 2005 when I was finishing up my MBA we had a discussion with one of our professors who also owns an International Business Company... basically, make it somewhere else and sell it here.
The business leaders then, even down to small businesses, realize that we are heading towards a society where we provide jobs just so people have income to buy and from there it will eventually end our way of life.
Ivan
How did the last bush get into office without having the majority of the popular vote? It has happened a few times, got enough electoral votes, but, not the populace? Fools with tools are everywhere, albeit money instead of tools? A friends relatives start up company needs some help, with a nice fat government contract? Just print some more money, we are good for it? When they deal with trillions, millions are chump change? It is easier to sway a couple electoral votes than a few million voters? The electoral college is grass roots lobbying!Okiewan said:
Wow, it's like there are 10-12 points in that paragraph :p
If you'd like the left and right coasts to have ALL the say in who sits in that office... go with the popular vote. If you'd like the fly-over states to matter at all, stay with the electoral.
Frankly if both coasts just fell into the ocean, we'd be better off :)
If you'd like the left and right coasts to have ALL the say in who sits in that office... go with the popular vote. If you'd like the fly-over states to matter at all, stay with the electoral.
Frankly if both coasts just fell into the ocean, we'd be better off :)
I wouldn't bring the coasts falling off! The populated edges get more electoral votes also? I do not believe there would be that big of a difference, it seems a safe guard for money to weasel its way in and sway electoral votes. Almost any issue, dig deep enough, its money, or means money to someone. And it is a proven fact, money does not make the world go round. Even when we are no longer here, it will still turn.
89er, I watched an hour of reruns of the simpsons, when is the quiz?
POTUS? Now a radio station is calling the shots, on the internet?
