We filed suit to reopen Coyote Canyon Rd

[JPIVEY]

More in the works

On Wednesday, November 16, 2005, EcoLogic Partners, Inc., a non-profit corporation that involves itself in controversial land use matters in the western United States, filed suit in San Diego County Superior Court against the California Department of Parks and Recreation (“State Parks”), alleging that State Parks illegally closed a 3.1-mile segment of Coyote Canyon to motorized vehicles, and that the closure constitutes a continuing public nuisance that must be abated.


The complaint, which also lists two individuals, Jim Arbogast and Wayne Todd, as plaintiffs, indicates that Coyote Canyon was first used as a road in 1775, when Captain Juan Bautista de Anza led an expedition through the canyon on his way from Sonora, Mexico to San Francisco, California (Norte Mexico). In fact, Coyote Canyon is part of the federally-designated Juan Bautista de Anza historic trail. It also happens to lie within the Anza-Borrego Desert State Park.


Public use of Coyote Canyon Road has been near-constant since de Anza’s original journey. During the 19<SUP>th</SUP> and 20<SUP>th</SUP> centuries the road was used by pioneers and homesteaders, miners, farmers, ranchers, tourists, and desert residents traveling between Borrego Springs in the south to towns such as Anza in the north. The road was also popular with 4-Wheel drive vehicle enthusiasts. According to the complaint, such public use was sufficient to establish Coyote Canyon as a public road.


Vehicle use of the road, however, came to a halt in 1995, when State Parks adopted a new Public Use Plan for Coyote Canyon which called for the closure of the 3.1-mile middle section to protect natural resources. Since that time, both the north and south entrances to the middle section have been gated and fenced.


According to the complaint, however, these obstructions violate California Civil Code section 3479, which forbids anyone from blocking a public road. The complaint acknowledges that some public agencies – namely Caltrans, counties, and cities – have the authority to close public roads, but that State Parks is not among them. Moreover, even those agencies that hold the power to close roads may do so only in limited circumstances, such as when the road must be repaired or no longer serves the public. No agency has the right to close a public road for purposes of natural resource protection, as State Parks did in 1995 when it fenced in Coyote Canyon.


The complaint does not seek monetary damages, but instead asks that the Court direct State Parks to abate the public nuisance by removing the gates, fencing, and other obstructions and thereby reopening the road.

Although the road is located entirely within the Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, the underlying jurisdiction over the road rests with the County of Riverside and the County of San Diego. For this reason, both counties have been named as Real Parties in Interest in the litigation.


The case has been assigned to Judge Jacqueline M. Stern, North County Division of the San Diego County Superior Court.

 

[TemeculaTim]

Crossing my fingers on this one. Spent many good times 4-wheeling through that canyon............................ and it is getting harder and harder to slide my bike under that frickin pipe fence they put up in the middle of the canyon.

 

[kelsorat]

JP have you heard any news regarding Randsburg closures. I don't know the full story, but the jest was that the citizens of the town were trying to close the public streets to off-roaders.

 

[JPIVEY]

Yeah, I've been hearing this also, right now they are trying to draft an ord. to stop it, but even the business owners are not real thrilled with trying to stop it, we are a big part of their income.

The thing I'm not sure of is the San Bernardino ord. they are working on, if Randsberg is in SB county, then it's a good posibility we will be ban from the streets.

On the othe hand, there are legal trails into Randsberg and the OHV community has or will buy a 2 acre lot for OHV parking.

 

[CRF_Tom]

Randsburg is in Kern Co. if that helps at all.

 

[JPIVEY]

Yeah it does, it makes it a fight between the residents and the business owners who want to keep us around

 

[Boodac]

As it is the CHP and the sheriffs for the area don’t allow you to ride on the streets into town anyways. There’s basically one way your suppose to come in and out of town :ride: and as soon as you hit the pavement your suppose to push the bike. The people around the town aren’t all that bad; it’s the idiot riders that scream around kicking up dust in town on their bikes that get their goat. :pissed: I’ve seen it happen first hand and can understand why they might get a little upset. For the most part, 99% of the people visiting towns on dirt bikes are families with kids in tow. The remaining 1% are the fools you see that give us a bad name. Ransburg is a fun stop after a ride. They have the bar type saloon and an Ice Cream Parlor that are fun to take a break at after a day of riding. :cool: