SoFlo

Member
Jul 31, 2005
194
0
I was reading a review on a dirtbike the other day that said, "when you can ride on an aluminum frame, and not notice it, then that's a good frame", or something to that effect. I guess they give a harsher ride? Why, because they're more rigid?
And if those are the cons, what are the pros or these frames?
Is it anything a novice would notice or care about?
:ride:
 

AnTs

Uhhh...
Nov 5, 2005
246
0
Its light weight... i went from a yz250F to a cr 250... and when i jumped the cr250 i like flewww way paste the landing ramp and landed in bushes... you deffinatley can tell when your jumping. Also when we lift it into the truck its easy and when we put it up in the sunroom its very easy...
 

SoFlo

Member
Jul 31, 2005
194
0
AnTs said:
Its light weight... i went from a yz250F to a cr 250... and when i jumped the cr250 i like flewww way paste the landing ramp and landed in bushes... you deffinatley can tell when your jumping. Also when we lift it into the truck its easy and when we put it up in the sunroom its very easy...

So the weight is for sure one thing.
Is it stronger than the steel type?
 

oldfrt613

Feeble Sponsoring Member
Member
Jun 29, 2005
443
0
Aluminum is not stronger than steel per say, but it does have a higher specific strength - that is for a given job, aluminum can be made lighter than steel - it will take more aluminum ( more volume ), but it will weigh less than its steel counterpart in the end.
 

kx250kev

Member
Jan 17, 2005
130
0
I think some of it has to do with frame flex. I remember when the new 97 CR's came out, many complained of a harsh ride. I never rode one, but I've talked to those who had them. Many got rid of them soon after.
 

oldfrt613

Feeble Sponsoring Member
Member
Jun 29, 2005
443
0
Had an infamous '97 - wasn't the frame - atrocious valving on the forks - I lovingly called it the "swap monster" until revalve. The '97 frame was actually too stiff - suspension had to do all the work. Frame is a favorite among jumpers.
 

+30

Member
Aug 2, 2005
276
0
alum

I like the alum frame everything is well positioned, everything fits without pushing and shoving and preloading like my 04 rm. As an intermediate vet mxer I cant feel a quantifiable difference in stiffness between the cr and rm, but I do like the balance of the cr better. Most contribe this to the frame. I think it just fits me better. It has been through alot of abuse with no problems. and no rust to worry about. I know I know alum corrodes. blah blah,,,,I would worry more about the motor of your next bike than the frame though. No one I know has broken any part of a cr falumi frame, but several friends have broken steel frames, pegs, linkage mounts etc....
 

mxneagle

Member
Jan 7, 2001
320
0
I always get a chuckle out of the comments by the novice riders who review the aluminum frames and comment about it being too rigid and wishing it had the flex of a steel frame. Like they can actually ride the bike hard enough to notice the difference. If a magazine were to say the frames flexed too much they would come back and tell you they could feel the frame moving too much and and giving them a mushy feeling in the whoops. For 99% of us it is the suspension is the biggest issue.
 

Masterphil

DRN's Resident Lunatic
Member
Aug 3, 2004
1,003
0
I'll stick with the good stuff, 4130 STEEL BABY!!! Powdercoating sure does hold up a lot better than paint. Looks better than that dirty stained aluminum, too!
 

Welcome to DRN

No trolls, no cliques, no spam & newb friendly. Do it.

FRESH VIDEO

Top Bottom