Originally posted by XRpredator
The problem, nephron, is that 2-stroke development is going to stangnate if the EPA goes through with their plans. Also, if the manufacturers are able to continue building 2-strokes, they'll be closed-course machines only. What are guys going to do with their used bikes, since they won't be legal for off-road use?
Don't get me wrong, I want to keep the spooge machines around, since they make things interesting. But, I have to agree with <gasp!> MXA. When the factories start putting their #1 riders on 4-strokes, 2-stroke development will die.:(
Two words: Cali-Fornia!:p The EPA is going to follow CARB, no matter how inane or asanine their regulations are.Originally posted by nephron
So please explain to me WHY this is happening. I'd sure like to know.:)
Originally posted by XRpredator
When the factories start putting their #1 riders on 4-strokes, 2-stroke development will die.:(
Originally posted by DougRoost
The Hindenburg was not about Hydrogen, it was about the coated fabric the skin was made of. This has been proven yet the stigma (wive's tale) of hydrogen remains.
.."2 cycle CAT motors"; Caterpillar build very fine large 4-Stroke diesel motors. Detriot builds 2-Stroke diesels. The 2-stroke diesel design was a WW11 product and lasted in a variety of configuations untill the early 1980's !!
No, but that's where the big dinero is. Although, I'm beginning to wonder if KTM will surpass Suzuki in the near future . . .:thinkOriginally posted by HiG4s
The big four are not the only game in town.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?