No disrespect to the Husky, but as an alternative, for $2,800 you could probably find a decent '00 KTM 200 e/xc.
No; I won't pay that much for it. But yes, an e/xc can be found for that much. In as good of condition (low hours)? Maybe not in as good of condition, but close.
I believe the 200 e/xc is the best attempt so far in that class (U listening, *william*?), but IMHO it falls short in a few key areas, which hopefully KTM worked out (OK: lay it on me :flame: )
The following experiences are based on two I rode, a 97 1/2 Jackpiner - certainly the finest looking machine ever made (I took photos), and a '99. In all fairness, I've included (WR125 comments or explainations.)
1) The forks were harsh 'Zokes. (The WR has them too.)
2) The rear felt vague, squirrely, never seemed to dig into the soil as well as it should. (Lord knows what a Sachs shock would bring. Didn't they build motorcycles in the past?)
3) It steered heavy for such a light bike, more than it's weight implies. (Too relaxed of a steering-head angle.)
4) It ran out of gears way too soon; seem like they could be spaced better. (same with the WR, but understandable on a 125, not a 200.)
Now the e/xc has a lot going for it: lightest 200 yet, KTM quality, a real manly motor w/outrageous delivery, a good layout. Thing is, the power is such I know my son would get hurt by it's shear quantity and the way it's delivered (yes, it can be tamed down); in contrast, the WR is even lighter still by ~10%, and the seat height a tad lower, less intimidating for his 5'-6" frame. I believe I talked myself into the Husky... :thumb:
Oh, I almost forgot: anyone have any KTM flame-shields to loan?