marcusgunby
LIFETIME SPONSOR
- Jan 9, 2000
- 6,450
- 2
I would put money on MC not coming top 5 at a national or mxdn
Originally posted by flyfishdoc
MC in no way deserves to go... just because he's been good in the past doesnt mean you should send him to compete with the top riders in the world. Thats like sending Enron to the World Bussiness Competition!
MC is washed up... now he's nothing more than a past-his-prime-poster-boy for Bud Light... yea he's had his fair share of Bud Lights
This Bud's for you!
Originally posted by flyfishdoc
Jasle- the point is this- MC is one of the most talented men to ever have kick started a bike, but his time is over. To let MC go would be to deprive a younger racer of the oppurtunity to gain both experience and knowledge which could one day place him on the level of MC. I want our country to be represented by the riders who were the best this year, not the best last year, or the year before.
Originally posted by MX Mac
Who do you people think you are? If anyone posting a message in this thread had finished 3rd in SX, you would think you were god's gift to MX.
Originally posted by angry jim
Jasle,
Since when do Americans shoot for 5th place? ;)
I think MX is physically more demanding than SX. SX pays more because it generates more money and it's very TV friendly. Also, up the 60,000 people pay to watch those indoor races. It's cool to defend McGrath, but it's a tough sell imo.
Originally posted by MX Mac
Who do you people think you are? If anyone posting a message in this thread had finished 3rd in SX, you would think you were god's gift to MX.
Originally posted by Interfire
Nuff said.