Vic said:That's convenient.
Roger that, Good Doctor.thumbs said:Good news to hear. Too bad there will be another nut job to take his place.
Hopefully if they release the photos, it will be identifiable as Bin Laden.WASHINGTON (AP) -- A U.S. official says Osama bin Laden was shot above his left eye, blowing away part of his skull.
RM_guy said:Turns out he's been dead for a while and they had him on ice until the right opportunity came around. Check it out... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpBPVkpmoeg
Okiewan said:Surprised?
They won't be releasing any photographs.
http://www.cnn.com/2011/POLITICS/05/04/bin.laden.photo.release/index.html?hpt=T1
A new drink, but one with a very pleasant after tasteholeshot said:Drink of the year -
two shots and a splash of salt water
Okiewan said:I'm sure there will be plenty of blow-back on these comments, just try to think beyond the obvious for a moment... cool? Food for thought... ya know? Just an opposing point of view about values, doing the right thing, etc. I'm just gonna throw this out.
Obama says "Trust me, he's dead", we just don't want to upset Islam. Really? They like to present us with videos cutting the head off Americans... we kill terrorists daily... right? Maybe we should stop killing them, wouldn't that make them even more happy?
I'm not one of those that thinks it's possible he's not actually dead.... I'm one of those that thinks it's entirely possible he's been dead for some time. He's been very useful in the "war on terror" after all (which is quite profitable), until a body shows-up, why not ride that pony for a while? I've not "made up my mind" one way or another, it is comical however to watch this gov story "evolve". I just happen to take things with a grain of salt until I see enough to convince me. Cynical? So be it.
Nevermind the guy deserves to die, it's still unconstitutional to assassinate, which by the "latest" gov story is exactly what happened... he wasn't armed (per the gov) and a team of Seals had no choice but to blow his head off? Really? They couldn't subdue the guy?
Make no mistake, I'm not going to miss the guy, but... we aren't supposed to put out hit orders. A 60+ old man with renal failure I'm sure posed a massive threat to the lowly Seals? They had no choice but to shoot? Really?
Sorry, the days of taking the gov story on face value are long gone. We are to believe the story with ZERO evidence? No body, no pics, no nada? Okay then, rejoice in the killing, it's all good. They'd never lie to us, would they?
What do I really think? I have no freaking idea. :whoa: "You can't handle the truth" comes to mind, sorry.